The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted Chromosomal Cleavage and Mutagenesis in Drosophila Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Abstract
Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) are hybrids between a nonspecific DNA-cleavage domain and a DNA-binding domain composed of Cys2His2 zinc fingers. Because zinc fingers can be manipulated to recognize a broad range of sequences, these enzymes have the potential to direct cleavage to arbitrarily chosen targets. We have tested this idea by designing a pair of ZFNs that recognize a unique site in the yellow (y) gene of Drosophila. When these nucleases were expressed in developing larvae, they led to somatic mutations specifically in the y gene. These somatic mosaics were observed in approximately one-half of the males expressing both nucleases. Germline y mutations were recovered from 5.7% of males, but from none of the females, tested. DNA sequences were determined and showed that all of the mutations were small deletions and/or insertions located precisely at the designed target. These are exactly the types of alterations expected from nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) following double-strand cleavage of the target. This approach promises to permit generation of directed mutations in many types of cells and organisms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In NHEJ, protein factors re-ligate the broken DNA strand either directly or by including nucleotide insertions or deletions (indels) (Hefferin & Tomkinson, 2005). This process occurs without a homologous DNA template, regularly leading to mutations and deletions in the repaired strand (Bibikova et al., 2002), as shown in Figure 1(A). NHEJ is, therefore, characterized as error-prone.”
From Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches (2018) · cites this paper as Bibikova et al., 2002
In the citing paper
“The design of a ZFN pair targeting opposite strands with an offset of 6 bp results in a DSB in the targeted DNA and can subsequently be repaired by NHEJ or HDR [88].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“For example, if the nuclease action mutates unintended targets that are important for cellular physiology, the treated cells may become dysfunctional or even die [61,62,63].”
From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [61]
In the citing paper
“The fundamental safety concern for using ZFN mediated gene disruption for human therapy is the specificity of gene targeting.”
From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
The Genome Sequence of Drosophila melanogaster
Adams, M. D., Celniker, S., Holt, R. A., Evans, C. A., Gocayne, J. D., Amanatides, P. G., Scherer, S. E., Li, P. W., Hoskins, R. A., Galle, R. F., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 · Cited by 5,902
[12] One-step gene disruption in yeast
Rothstein, R. J. (1983) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0 · Cited by 3,282
Zinc Finger-DNA Recognition: Crystal Structure of a Zif268-DNA Complex at 2.1 Å
Pavletich, N. P., & Pabo, C. O. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2028256 · Cited by 2,081
Altering the Genome by Homologous Recombination
Capecchi, M. R. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2660260 · Cited by 2,037
Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain.
Kim, Y. G., Cha, J., & Chandrasegaran, S. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.3.1156 · Cited by 1,889
Mansour, S. L., Thomas, K. R., & Capecchi, M. R. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/336348a0 · Cited by 1,683
Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection
van Gent, D. C., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., & Kanaar, R. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35056049 · Cited by 1,219
Design and Selection of Novel Cys2His2 Zinc Finger Proteins
Pabo, C. O., Peisach, E., & Grant, R. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.313 · Cited by 715
Stimulation of Homologous Recombination through Targeted Cleavage by Chimeric Nucleases
Bibikova, M. V., Carroll, D., Segal, D. J., Trautman, J. K., Smith, J., Kim, Y., & Chandrasegaran, S. (2001) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.21.1.289-297.2001 · Cited by 614
Self-citationGene Targeting by Homologous Recombination in Drosophila
Rong, Y. S., & Golic, K. G. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5473.2013 · Cited by 557
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 858
Making ends meet: targeted integration of DNA fragments by genome editing
Yamamoto, Y., & Gerbi, S. A. (2018) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-018-0677-6 · Cited by 49
Growth Traits and Sperm Proteomics Analyses of Myostatin Gene-Edited Chinese Yellow Cattle
Zhao, Y., Yang, L., Su, G., Wei, Z., Liu, X., Song, L., Hai, C., Wu, D., Hao, Z., Wu, Y., et al. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12050627 · Cited by 43
The molecular basis of social behavior: models, methods and advances
LeBoeuf, A. C., Benton, R., & Keller, L. (2012) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.008 · Cited by 43
Endonucleases: tools to correct the dystrophin gene
Rousseau, J., Chapdelaine, P., Boisvert, S., de Almeida, L. P., Corbeil, J., Montpetit, A., & Tremblay, J. P. (2011) · The Journal of Gene Medicine · doi:10.1002/jgm.1611 · Cited by 46
Genome engineering: Drosophila melanogaster and beyond
Venken, K. J. T., Sarrion‐Perdigones, A., Vandeventer, P. J., Abel, N. S., Christiansen, A. E., & Hoffman, K. L. (2015) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.214 · Cited by 43
Editorial: Our Top 10 Developments in Stem Cell Biology over the Last 30 Years
Armstrong, L., Lako, M., Buckley, N. J., Lappin, T. R. J., Murphy, M. J., Nolta, J. A., Pittenger, M. F., & Stojković, M. (2011) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1007 · Cited by 43
Bradbury, A., Clapp, O., Biacsi, A.-S., Kuo, P. C., Gaju, O., Hayta, Ş., Zhu, J., & Lambing, C. (2025) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101386 · Cited by 44
Jamal, M., Khan, F. A., Lin, D., Habib, Z., Dai, J., & Cao, G. (2016) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.21775/cimb.020.001 · Cited by 41
Herrmann, F., Garriga-Canut, M., Baumstark, R., Fajardo-Sánchez, E., Cotterell, J., Minoche, A. E., Himmelbauer, H., & Isalan, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020913 · Cited by 41
CrisprGE: a central hub of CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing
Kaur, K., Tandon, H., Gupta, A., & Kumar, M. (2015) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/bav055 · Cited by 41
Cas9-Based Genome Editing in Drosophila
Housden, B. E., Lin, S., & Perrimon, N. (2014) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801185-0.00019-2 · Cited by 41
Genome Editing: From Drosophila to Non-Model Insects and Beyond
Huang, Y., Liu, Z., & Rong, Y. S. (2016) · Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.007 · Cited by 42
Innovative approaches to genome editing in avian species
Cooper, C. A., Doran, T. J., Challagulla, A., Tizard, M. L., & Jenkins, K. A. (2018) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-018-0231-7 · Cited by 45
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in a chicken model: current approaches and applications
Chojnacka-Puchta, L., & Sawicka, D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-020-00537-9 · Cited by 44
Site‐Specific DNA Recombinases as Instruments for Genomic Surgery
Akopian, A., & Stark, W. M. (2005) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(05)55001-6 · Cited by 41
Using Nucleases to Stimulate Homologous Recombination
Carroll, D. (2004) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1385/1-59259-761-0:195 · Cited by 41
Self-citationCRISPR/Cas9 technology and its application in horticultural crops
Liu, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, X., Li, X., & You, C. (2022) · Horticultural Plant Journal · doi:10.1016/j.hpj.2022.04.007 · Cited by 41
The Design and In Vivo Evaluation of Engineered I-OnuI-Based Enzymes for HEG Gene Drive
Chan, Y.-S., Takeuchi, R., Jarjour, J., Huen, D. S., Stoddard, B. L., & Russell, S. R. H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074254 · Cited by 40
CRISPR‐Cas9 systems: versatile cancer modelling platforms and promising therapeutic strategies
Wen, W., Yuan, Z., Ma, S., Jiang, X., & Yuan, D. (2015) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.29626 · Cited by 41
CRISPR to fix bad blood: a new tool in basic and clinical hematology
González-Romero, E., Martínez-Valiente, C., García-Ruiz, C., Vázquez‐Manrique, R. P., Cervera, J., & Sanjuán-Pla, A. (2019) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2018.211359 · Cited by 42
Bhattacharyya, N., Anand, U., Kumar, R. S., Ghorai, M., Aftab, T., Jha, N. K., Rajapaksha, A. U., Bundschuh, J., Bontempi, E., & Dey, A. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01474-1 · Cited by 42
Zinc-finger nucleases: new strategies to target the rat genome
Geurts, A. M., & Moreno, C. (2010) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20100201 · Cited by 41
Myburgh, R., Ivic, S., Pepper, M. S., Gers-Huber, G., Li, D., Audigé, A., Rochat, M.-A., Jaquet, V., Regenass, S., Manz, M. G., et al. (2015) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00277-15 · Cited by 42
A Tale of Two Moieties: Rapidly Evolving CRISPR/Cas-Based Genome Editing
Yang, L. C., & Chen, J. (2020) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2020.06.003 · Cited by 38
Developments and Prospects in Imperative Underexploited Vegetable Legumes Breeding: A Review
Dhaliwal, S. K., Talukdar, A., Gautam, A., Sharma, P., Sharma, V. K., & Kaushik, P. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21249615 · Cited by 39
Chailleux, C., Aymard, F., Caron, P., Daburon, V., Courilleau, C., Canitrot, Y., Legube, G., & Trouche, D. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.031 · Cited by 37
Targeted mutagenesis in the progeny of maize transgenic plants
Yang, M., Djukanovic, V., Stagg, J., Lenderts, B., Bidney, D. L., Falco, S. C., & Lyznik, L. A. (2009) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-009-9499-5 · Cited by 38
Gabsalilow, L., Schierling, B., Friedhoff, P., Pingoud, A. M., & Wende, W. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt080 · Cited by 38
Musunuru, K. (2017) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.002 · Cited by 38
Hematopoietic Stem Cell-Targeted Gene-Addition and Gene-Editing Strategies for β-hemoglobinopathies
Drysdale, C. M., Nassehi, T., Gamer, J., Yapundich, M., Tisdale, J. F., & Uchida, N. (2021) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2021.01.001 · Cited by 39
Improvement of glucosinolates by metabolic engineering in Brassica crops
Miao, H., Zeng, W., Wang, J., Zhang, F., Sun, B., & Wang, Q. (2021) · aBIOTECH · doi:10.1007/s42994-021-00057-y · Cited by 39
Employing CRISPR/Cas Technology for the Improvement of Potato and Other Tuber Crops
TUSSIPKAN, D., & Manabayeva, S. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.747476 · Cited by 44
How Genome Editing Can Be Helpful in the Biofortification of Legumes
Ullah, Z., Iqbal, J., Abbasi, B. A., Ijaz, S., Sharifi‐Rad, J., Yaseen, T., Uddin, S., & Mahmood, T. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33957-8_8 · Cited by 36
Global status of gene edited animals for agricultural applications
Ledesma, A. V., & Eenennaam, A. L. V. (2024) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106142 · Cited by 36
Gene knockout and knockin by zinc-finger nucleases: current status and perspectives
Hauschild‐Quintern, J., Petersen, B., Cost, G. J., & Niemann, H. (2012) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-012-1204-1 · Cited by 38
Hermann, M., Maeder, M. L., Rector, K., Ruiz, J., Becher, B., Bürki, K., Khayter, C., Aguzzi, A., Joung, J. K., Buch, T., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041796 · Cited by 35
CRISPR ‐Cas9 technology and its application in haematological disorders
Zhang, H., & McCarty, N. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.14297 · Cited by 37
Jiang, H., Newman, M., & Lardelli, M. T. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206155 · Cited by 38
Zinc finger nuclease technology: Advances and obstacles in modelling and treating genetic disorders
Jabalameli, H. R., Zahednasab, H., Moghadam, A. K., & Jabalameli, M. R. (2014) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.12.044 · Cited by 39
Psychiatric Disorders - Trends and Developments
Uehara, T. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/2330 · Cited by 36
Current status of genome editing in vector mosquitoes: A review
Reegan, A. D., Ceasar, S. A., Paulraj, M. G., Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu, S. J., & Al-Dhabi, N. A. (2016) · BioScience Trends · doi:10.5582/bst.2016.01180 · Cited by 37
CRISPR Genome Engineering for Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research
Chaterji, S., Ahn, E. H., & Kim, D. (2017) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.18456 · Cited by 35
CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Genome Editing in Bicyclus anynana Butterflies
Banerjee, T. D., & Monteiro, A. (2018) · Methods and Protocols · doi:10.3390/mps1020016 · Cited by 30
CRISPR/Cas9 a simple, inexpensive and effective technique for gene editing
Ferreira, P., & Choupina, A. (2022) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-022-07442-w · Cited by 39
Targeted disruption of exogenous EGFP gene in medaka using zinc‐finger nucleases
Ansai, S., Ochiai, H., Kanie, Y., Kamei, Y., Gou, Y., Kitano, T., Yamamoto, T., & Kinoshita, M. (2012) · Development Growth & Differentiation · doi:10.1111/j.1440-169x.2012.01357.x · Cited by 34
Use of genome-editing tools to treat sickle cell disease
Tasan, I., Jain, S., & Zhao, H. (2016) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-016-1688-0 · Cited by 36
Xu, S. Q., Cao, S., Zou, B., Yue, Y., Gu, C., Chen, X., Wang, P., Dong, X., Zheng, X., Li, K., et al. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1038-5 · Cited by 34
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of homologous genes in Chinese kale
Sun, B., Zheng, A., Jiang, M., Xue, S., Yuan, Q., Jiang, L., Chen, Q., Li, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34884-9 · Cited by 34
Recent developments and clinical studies utilizing engineered zinc finger nuclease technology
Jo, Y.-I., Kim, S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2015) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-015-1956-5 · Cited by 37
Targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish
Woods, I. G., & Schier, A. F. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0608-650 · Cited by 34
Therapeutic Gene Editing Safety and Specificity
Lux, C. T., & Scharenberg, A. M. (2017) · Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2017.05.002 · Cited by 33
Huang, N., Huang, Z., Gao, M., Luo, Z., Zhou, F., Liu, L., Xiao, Q., Wang, X., & Feng, W. (2018) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-018-0732-4 · Cited by 32
Stem cell-derived clade F AAVs mediate high-efficiency homologous recombination-based genome editing
Smith, L. J., Wright, J. B., Clark, G., Ul-Hasan, T., Jin, X., Fong, A., Chandra, M., Martin, T. S., Rubin, H. L., Knowlton, D., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1802343115 · Cited by 33
Ways of improving precise knock-in by genome-editing technologies
Smirnikhina, S., Anuchina, A. A., & Лавров, А. В. (2018) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-018-1953-5 · Cited by 32
The application of genome editing technology in fish
Lü, J., Fang, W., Huang, J., & Li, S. (2021) · Marine Life Science & Technology · doi:10.1007/s42995-021-00091-1 · Cited by 36
Creation of a type IIS restriction endonuclease with a long recognition sequence
Lippow, S. M., Aha, P. M., Parker, M. H., Blake, W. J., Baynes, B. M., & Lipovšek, D. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp182 · Cited by 33
Efficient creation of an APOE knockout rabbit
Ji, D., Zhao, G., Songstad, A. E., Cui, X., & Weinstein, E. J. (2014) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-014-9834-8 · Cited by 34
Human induced pluripotent stem cells for monogenic disease modelling and therapy
Spitalieri, P., Talarico, V. R., Murdocca, M., Novelli, G., & Sangiuolo, F. C. (2016) · World Journal of Stem Cells · doi:10.4252/wjsc.v8.i4.118 · Cited by 34
Disease modeling in genetic kidney diseases: zebrafish
Schenk, H. J., Müller‐Deile, J., Kinast, M., & Schiffer, M. (2017) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-017-2593-0 · Cited by 33
Genetic Engineering of Horticultural Crops
Gaur, R. K., Verma, R. K., & Khurana, S. M. P. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-810439-2.00002-7 · Cited by 31
Strategies for gene disruption in Drosophila
Lin, S.-C., Chang, Y.-Y., & Chan, C.-C. (2014) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/2045-3701-4-63 · Cited by 35
Michno, J., Virdi, K. S., Stec, A. O., Liu, J., Wang, X., Xiong, Y., & Stupar, R. M. (2020) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12896-020-00604-3 · Cited by 31
Recent advances in the use of ZFN-mediated gene editing for human gene therapy
Chandrasegaran, S. (2017) · Cell and Gene Therapy Insights · doi:10.18609/cgti.2017.005 · Cited by 31
Du, L., Zhou, A., Patel, A., Rao, M., Anderson, K. C., & Roy, S. (2017) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.05.009 · Cited by 31
Mutagenesis-based plant breeding approaches and genome engineering: A review focused on tomato
Shahwar, D., Ahn, N., Kim, D., Ahn, W., & Park, Y.-H. (2023) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2023.108473 · Cited by 32
The use of TALENs for nonhomologous end joining mutagenesis in silkworm and fruitfly
Takasu, Y., Tamura, T., Sajwan, S., Kobayashi, I., & Žurovec, M. (2014) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.014 · Cited by 30
Olsen, P. A., Gelazauskaite, M., Randøl, M., & Krauss, S. J. K. (2010) · BMC Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2199-11-35 · Cited by 32
Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: In Quest of Clinical Applications
Madonna, R. (2012) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-012-9504-0 · Cited by 30
Huang, G., Tong, C., Kumbhani, D. S., Ashton, C., Yan, H., & Ying, Q. (2011) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.10.7.15233 · Cited by 30
Gene therapy for inherited metabolic diseases
Yılmaz, B. Ş., Gurung, S., Perocheau, D. P. B., Counsell, J. R., & Baruteau, J. (2020) · PubMed Central · doi:10.34763/jmotherandchild.20202402si.2004.000009 · Cited by 31
Genome editing in cultured fishes
Hallerman, E. M. (2021) · CABI Agriculture and Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s43170-021-00066-3 · Cited by 32
Rewriting the blueprint of life by synthetic genomics and genome engineering
Annaluru, N., Ramalingam, S., & Chandrasegaran, S. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0689-y · Cited by 30
The Hitchhiker's guide to Xenopus genetics
Abu‐Daya, A., Khokha, M. K., & Zimmerman, L. B. (2012) · genesis · doi:10.1002/dvg.22007 · Cited by 30
An Enhanced Gene Targeting Toolkit forDrosophila: Golic+
Chen, H.-M., Huang, Y., Pfeiffer, B. D., Yao, X., & Lee, T. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.173716 · Cited by 30
Generation of genetically-engineered animals using engineered endonucleases
Lee, J. G., Sung, Y. H., & Baek, I. (2018) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-018-1037-z · Cited by 31
CRISPR/Cas9‐based genome engineering of zebrafish using a seamless integration strategy
Luo, J., Bian, W.-P., Liu, Y., Huang, H., Yin, Q., Yang, X., & Pei, D. (2018) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201800077rr · Cited by 30
Genome Manipulation Advances in Selected Aquaculture Organisms
Wang, J., Cheng, Y., Su, B., & Dunham, R. A. (2024) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12988 · Cited by 33
Whyte, J. J., & Prather, R. S. (2011) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4546 · Cited by 30
García‐León, J. A., Vitórica, J., & Gutiérrez, A. (2019) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2018-0520 · Cited by 30
A heterodimer of evolved designer-recombinases precisely excises a human genomic DNA locus
Lansing, F., Paszkowski‐Rogacz, M., Schmitt, L. T., Schneider, P. M., Romanos, T. R., Sonntag, J., & Buchholz, F. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1078 · Cited by 29
Advance genome editing technologies in the treatment of human diseases: CRISPR therapy (Review)
Alagöz, M., & Kherad, N. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3892/ijmm.2020.4609 · Cited by 32
Prìeto, J., Redondo, P. N., Padró, D., Arnould, S., Epinat, J.-C., Pâques, F., Blanco, F. J., & Montoya, G. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm183 · Cited by 29
Targeted disruption of the sheep MSTN gene by engineered zinc-finger nucleases
Zhang, C., Wang, L., Ren, G., Li, Z., Ren, C., Zhang, T., Xu, K., & Zhang, Z. (2013) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-013-2853-3 · Cited by 28
Boerjan, B., Cardoen, D., Verdonck, R., Caers, J., & Schoofs, L. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z2012-010 · Cited by 29
Gene therapy in wound healing using nanotechnology
Pang, C., Fan, K. S., Wei, L., & Kolar, M. K. (2020) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12881 · Cited by 29
Disruption of mstn Gene by CRISPR/Cas9 in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea)
Yan, M., Li, B., Wang, J., Bai, Y., Ke, Q., Zhou, T., & Xu, P. (2022) · Marine Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10126-022-10135-x · Cited by 28
Targeted genome engineering via zinc finger nucleases
Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2010) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-010-0161-0 · Cited by 32
Targeted Genome Editing for Crop Improvement
Kim, H., Kim, S., Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2015) · Plant Breeding and Biotechnology · doi:10.9787/pbb.2015.3.4.283 · Cited by 28
Franz, A. W. E., Clem, R. J., & Passarelli, A. L. (2014) · Current Tropical Medicine Reports · doi:10.1007/s40475-013-0007-2 · Cited by 27
CRISPR and cardiovascular diseases
Musunuru, K. (2022) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvac048 · Cited by 36
New routes for transgenesis of the mouse
Belizário, J. E., Akamine, P. S., Wolf, P., Strauss, B. E., & Xavier‐Neto, J. (2012) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-012-0096-y · Cited by 26
Combining CRISPR/Cas9 and rAAV Templates for Efficient Gene Editing
Kaulich, M., & Dowdy, S. F. (2015) · Nucleic Acid Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/nat.2015.0545 · Cited by 25
Genome wide functional genetics in haploid cells
Elling, U., & Penninger, J. M. (2014) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2014.06.032 · Cited by 26
Application of CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing for the Treatment of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1
Marsh, S., Hanson, B., Wood, M. J. A., Varela, M. A., & Roberts, T. C. (2020) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.10.005 · Cited by 29
Future Approaches for Treating Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: CRISPR Therapy
Vuelta, E., García‐Tuñón, I., Hernández‐Carabias, P., Méndez, L., & Sánchez‐Martín, M. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10020118 · Cited by 27
Monobodies as tool biologics for accelerating target validation and druggable site discovery
Akkapeddi, P., Teng, K. W., & Koide, S. (2021) · RSC Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1md00188d · Cited by 24
Pea transformation: History, current status and challenges
Ludvíková, M., & Griga, M. (2022) · Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding · doi:10.17221/24/2022-cjgpb · Cited by 25
Luo, D., Liu, Y., Chen, J., Xia, X.-Q., Cao, M., Cheng, B., Wang, X., Gong, W., Qiu, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14057 · Cited by 25
The Landscape of Early Clinical Gene Therapies outside of Oncology
Rittié, L., Athanasopoulos, T., Calero-Garcia, M., Davies, M. L., Dow, D. J., Howe, S. J., Morrison, A., Ricciardelli, I., Saudemont, A., Jespers, L. S., et al. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.09.002 · Cited by 25
Highly Efficient Sex Chromosome Interchanges Produced By I-CreI Expression in Drosophila
Maggert, K. A., & Golic, K. G. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.040071 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bibikova, M., Golic, M., Golic, K. G., & Carroll, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carroll, Dana
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1169-1175
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1906155566
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (7r01gm060700-12)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM60700, R01 GM58504, R01GM058504)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Keywords
- zinc finger nucleases, targeted mutagenesis, Drosophila, yellow gene, germline mutations, non-homologous end joining, double-strand DNA cleavage, C2H2 zinc finger, directed mutagenesis
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Crosses, Genetic, Deoxyribonucleases, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Female, Genetic Vectors, Male, Ribonucleases, Transformation, Genetic, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Zinc Fingers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
