Cited by 179Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Changes in power with resistance training in older and younger men and women

Jozsi, A. C., Campbell, W. W., Joseph, L., Davey, S. L., Evans, W. J.·1999·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Muscle power diminishes with increasing age and inactivity. The capacity for older adults to increase muscle power with resistance exercise has not been examined; therefore, we examined the influence of progressive resistance training (PRT) on muscle power output in 17 men and women aged 56-66 years, and compared their responses to 15 men and women aged 21-30 years. METHODS: All subjects performed 12 weeks of PRT at a workload equivalent to 80% of the one repetition maximum (1RM). All training and assessments of 1RM and power were made on Keiser pneumatic resistance machines. Subjects performed five exercises, three sets per exercise, twice weekly. Muscle power was measured (isotonically) at resistances equivalent to 40, 60, and 80% of the 1RM, on the knee extension and arm pull machines. RESULTS: All subjects increased arm pull power similarly at 40 and 60% of 1RM, independent of age or sex. There was not a significant increase in arm pull power at 80% of 1RM. Older and younger subjects also had similar absolute increases in leg extensor power at 40 and 60% of 1RM, but men responded with greater absolute gains than women at these percentages (p < .05). The increase in leg extensor power at 80% of 1RM was similar in all groups. Older and younger subjects increased strength similarly in all exercises except the left knee extension. Independent of age, men increased strength more than women in all exercises except the double leg press. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that individuals in their sixth decade can still improve muscle power (and strength); however, men may realize greater absolute gains than women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/54.11.m591

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Roos MR, Rice CL, Vandervoort AA. Age-related changes in motor unit function. Muscle Nerve. 1996;20:679-690.
  2. Campbell WW, Crim MC, Young VR, Evans WJ. Increased energy re- quirements and changes in body composition with resistance training. Am 1 Clin Nutr. 1994;60: 167-175.
  3. Fiatarone MA, Marks EC, Ryan ND, Meredith CN, Lipsitz LA, Evans W1. High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. lAMA. 1990;263: 3029-3034.
  4. Faulkner JA. Power output of fast and slow fibers from skeletal muscles. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, eds. Human Muscle Power. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1986:61-94.
  5. Fiaterone MA, O'Neil EF, Ryan ND, et al. Exercise training and nutri- tional supplementation for physical frailty in very eldery people. New Engl J Med. 1994;330: 1769-1775.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jozsi, A. C., Campbell, W. W., Joseph, L., Davey, S. L., & Evans, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
54
Issue
11
Pages
M591-M596
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2165006995
Cited by
179
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01ag011811-07, AG11811)
  • National Institute on Aging (1 R29 AG13409, R01-AG-11811, R29AG013409)
  • National Center for Research Resources (MO1 RR10732, M01RR010732)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
muscle power, resistance training, older adults, aging, sex differences, knee extension, one-repetition maximum, age-related muscle loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscles, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review