Cited by 173Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology Research

Religious Attendance and Cognitive Functioning Among Older Mexican Americans

Hill, T. D., Burdette, A. M., Angel, J. L., Angel, R. J.·2006·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

Research shows that social engagement reduces the probability of cognitive decline in late life. The purpose of this study was to test whether religious attendance, a major source of social engagement for many older individuals, is associated with slower rates of cognitive decline among older Mexican Americans. Using four waves of data collected from a sample of 3,050 older Mexican-origin individuals, we estimated a series of linear growth curve models to assess the effects of religious attendance on cognitive functioning trajectories. We used the Mini-Mental State Examination to measure cognitive functioning. Our central finding is that religious attendance is associated with slower rates of cognitive decline among older Mexican Americans. Specifically, respondents who attend church monthly, weekly, and more than weekly tend to exhibit slower rates of cognitive decline than those who do not attend church.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/61.1.p3

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measures described as assessing one particular social concept may contain elements that assess other distinct social concepts.

    “Indeed, measures described as assessing one particular concept may contain elements that assess other distinct social concepts.”
  • One study reported significantly more carotid artery thickening, placing R/S individuals at higher risk for stroke.

    “One study, however, reported significantly more carotid artery thickening, placing R/S individuals at higher risk for stroke [418].”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [418]

    The Measurement of Chronic Disease section discusses self-reported histories of stroke, and the Main Analysis examines church attendance and cognitive decline. Neither section reports carotid artery thickening or an increased stroke risk among religious or spiritual individuals. Searches for carotid artery thickening and intima-media thickness found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ellison, C. (1994). Religion, health, the life stress paradigm, and the study of depression. In J. Levin (Ed.), Aging and health: Theoretical foundation and methodological frontiers (pp. 78-121). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  2. Schaie, K. (1983). The Seattle Longitudinal Study: A 21-year exploration of psychometric intelligence in adulthood. In K. Schaie (Ed.), Longitudinal studies of adult cognitive development (pp. 64-135). New York: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, T. D., Burdette, A. M., Angel, J. L., & Angel, R. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Hill, T. D.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
P3-P9
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2107415459
Cited by
173
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG010939)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
religious service attendance, cognitive decline, cognitive function, older Mexican Americans, social engagement, church attendance, cognitive aging, Mini-Mental State Examination, growth curve models
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Religion and Medicine, Mexican Americans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review