Cited by 690COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

Loneliness and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study Among Dutch Older Adults

Open access
van Tilburg, Theo G, Steinmetz, Stephanie, Stolte, Elske, van der Roest, Henriëtte, de Vries, Daniel H·2021·The Journals of Gerontology: Series B

Abstract

Objectives: With the spread of COVID-19, the Netherlands implemented a policy to keep citizens physically distanced. We hypothesize that consequent reduction in the frequency of social contacts, personal losses, and the experience of general threats in society reduced well-being. Methods: Data were collected from 1,679 Dutch community-dwelling participants aged 65–102 years comprising a longitudinal online panel. Social and emotional loneliness and mental health were measured in May 2020, that is, 2 months after the implementation of the measures, and earlier in October and November 2019. Results: In this pandemic, the loneliness of older people increased, but mental health remained roughly stable. The policy measures for physical distancing did not cause much social isolation but personal losses, worries about the pandemic, and a decline in trust in societal institutions were associated with increased mental health problems and especially emotional loneliness. Discussion: The consequences of long-term social isolation and well-being must be closely monitored.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbaa111

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bu, F, Steptoe, A, & Fancourt, D. (2020). Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. medRxiv. Preprint. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.14.20101360 PMC7405905 32768621 · DOI
  2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  3. Fung, H H, & Carstensen, L L. (2006). Goals change when life’s fragility is primed: Lessons learned from older adults, the September 11 attacks and SARS. Social Cognition, 24(3), 248– 278. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.248 · DOI
  4. Gordon, A L, Goodman, C, Achterberg, W, Barker, R O, Burns, E, Hanratty, B, Martin, F. C., Meyer, J., O’Neill, D., Schols, J., & Spilsbury, K. (2020). Commentary: COVID in care homes—challenges and dilemmas in healthcare delivery. Age and Ageing. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa113 PMC7239229 32402088 · DOI
  5. de Jong Gierveld, J, & van Tilburg, T. (2010). The de Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: Tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Ageing, 7(2), 121– 130. doi: 10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6 20730083 PMC2921057 · DOI · Paper page
  6. de Jong Gierveld, J, van Tilburg, T G, & Dykstra, P A. (2018). New ways of theorizing and conducting research in the field of loneliness and social isolation. In A L Vangelisti & D Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 391– 404). Cambridge University Press.
  7. Lazarus, R S, & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
  8. Luhmann, M, & Hawkley, L C. (2016). Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 943– 959. doi: 10.1037/dev0000117 27148782 PMC8015413 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Perlman, D, & Peplau, L A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In R Gilmour & S W Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships in disorder (pp. 31– 56). Academic Press.
  10. Perrig-Chiello, P, Spahni, S, Höpflinger, F, & Carr, D. (2016). Cohort and gender differences in psychosocial adjustment to later-life widowhood. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(4), 765– 774. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv004 25731182 · DOI
  11. Quan-Haase, A, Mo, G Y, & Wellman, B. (2017). Connected seniors: How older adults in East York exchange social support online and offline. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 967– 983. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1305428 · DOI
  12. Rook, K S, & Peplau, L A. (1982). Perspectives on helping the lonely. In L A Peplau & D Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 351– 378). Wiley.
  13. Scherpenzeel, A C, & Bethlehem, J G. (2011). How representative are online panels? Problems of coverage and selection and possible solutions. In M Das, P Ester, & L Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies (pp. 105– 132). Routledge.
  14. Weiss, R S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. MIT Press.
  15. Zeidner, M, & Ben-Zur, H. (1993). Coping with a national crisis: The Israeli experience with the threat of missile attacks. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 209– 224. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90191-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Tilburg, T. G., Steinmetz, S., Stolte, E., van der Roest, H., & de Vries, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
Published
2020-08-05
Volume
76
Issue
7
Pages
e249-e255
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W3045703442
Cited by
690
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 177 · 2020: 23
FWCI
53.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (10150062010007)
  • Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
loneliness, mental health, COVID-19 pandemic, older adults, social isolation, emotional loneliness, social contact, personal loss, well-being, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Netherlands, Social Isolation, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review