Cited by 17COVID-19 and Mental HealthSocial impacts of COVID-19Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health, quality of life and intrafamilial relations—A population-based survey in Germany.

Open access
Klein, Stephanie, Fegert, Jörg M., Geprägs, Alina, Brähler, Elmar, Clemens, Vera·2022·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The occurrence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (COVID-19) at the end of 2019 comes along with many challenges. Besides worry for one's own health and the well-being of the family, all measures applied to limit the spread of the coronavirus affected daily life. School closures, economic shutdown and contact restrictions have led to high levels of stress. The impact on health and families has been widely discussed. However, population-based data are scarce. Here, we have assessed health, quality of life and intrafamilial relations depending on the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a three-step random-route approach, a population-based sample of 2,515 persons (52.6% female, average age of 50.3 years) was recruited during the second COVID-19 wave in Germany in winter 2020/21. While the majority of participants reported no change in their health status and the relationship with their partner and children, more than half of participants reported a decreased quality of life since the beginning of the pandemic. Female gender, age above 60 years, a low household income, not living with a partner and the experience of childhood adversity were associated with a higher risk for a worsening of health, quality of life and intrafamilial relations. These had already been well-established risk factors ahead of the pandemic. In order to avoid further increase of inequality in our society and more devastating impact of the pandemic on health and intrafamilial relations, low-level support and intervention programs are urgently needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844057

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The average mental wellbeing and subjective quality of life decreased significantly in Germany during the COVID pandemic.

    “This is remarkable, considering that in the same time, due to the COVID pandemic and associated restrictions, the average mental wellbeing as well as subjective quality of life decreased significantly in Germany (26–28).”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy in a psychiatric day hospital—A longitudinal naturalistic effectiveness trial (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section ('Change of Health, Quality of Life and Intrafamilial Relations During the Pandemic'; page unavailable) reports that a majority of participants perceived a decline in quality of life. It does not report a statistically significant decline in average quality of life or mental wellbeing: most reported no change in general health, and the study's measure was not specifically mental wellbeing. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The previously described reduced wellbeing and quality of life in the general population during the pandemic did presumably apply also to the participants in this study.

    “The previously described reduced wellbeing and quality of life in the general population during the pandemic did presumably apply also to the participants in this study.”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy in a psychiatric day hospital—A longitudinal naturalistic effectiveness trial (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section reports that most respondents in a population-based German sample experienced worse quality of life during the pandemic. It also reports that about one quarter experienced worse general health, while most reported no health change; the paper does not establish a general reduction in wellbeing as a distinct measure. Whether the finding applied to the citing study’s participants is the citing authors’ stated presumption, not a finding of this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, S., Fegert, J. M., Geprägs, A., Brähler, E., & Clemens, V.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Clemens, Vera
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2022-03-11
Volume
13
Pages
844057-844057
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220930221
Cited by
17
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPen Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm (OPARU) (Ulm University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Universität Ulm, Kommunikations- und Informationszentrum (kiz) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, quality of life, family relationships, health status, childhood adversity, household income, gender differences, older adults, living arrangements, social inequality, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review