Cited by 163Aging and Gerontology ResearchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Generativity in Later Life: Perceived Respect From Younger Generations as a Determinant of Goal Disengagement and Psychological Well-being

Open access
Cheng, S.-T.·2009·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

It was hypothesized that actions to benefit the next generation would not lead to well-being unless they are perceived to be valued and respected and that the lack of perceived respect would further lead to disengagement from generative goals. Older persons responded to measures of generative concern, action, perceived respect, and psychological well-being at 2 time points 12 months apart. Structural equation modeling showed that at both time points, the effect of action on well-being was completely mediated by perceived respect. Moreover, a lack of perceived respect at baseline predicted a decrease in generative concern 12 months later, suggesting that, in later life, continuing concern is partly dependent on the attitudes of younger generations. When their attitudes are unfavorable, a downward spiral in generativity development and well-being is possible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbn027

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generative beliefs have been linked to a positive experience of aging, life satisfaction, and well-being for older adults.

    “Generative beliefs have been linked to a positive experience of aging, life satisfaction, and well-being for older adults (Cheng, 2009; Østbye et al., 2018; Thiele & Whelan, 2008; Ying et al., 2020).”

    From Generativity and Engagement in Grandparenting Activities Among Older Adults in Northern Sri Lanka (2023) · cites this paper as Cheng, 2009

    The Discussion reports that generative concern predicted psychological well-being in older adults. The Measures section defines that outcome using positive relations, purpose in life, personal growth, and self-acceptance; it does not assess life satisfaction or a positive experience of aging as separate outcomes (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cheng , S.-T. , Chan , A. C. M. , & Phillips , D. R. ( 2008 ). The ageing situation in Asia and the Pacifi c: Trends and priorities . In United Nations De- partment of Economic and Social Affairs (Ed.), Regional dimensions of the ageing situation (pp. 35 -69 ). New York : United Nations .
  2. Chiu , H. F. K. , Lee , H. B. , Chung , W. S. , & Kwong , P. K. ( 1994 ). Reliabil- ity and validity of the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Ex- amination: A preliminary report . Journal of the Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists , 4 (Suppl. 2) , 25 -28 .
  3. & E. de St Aubin (Eds.) , Generativity and adult development . Wash- ington, DC : American Psychological Association .
  4. Marsh , H. W. , Hau , K. T. , & Grayson , D. ( 2005 ). Goodness of fi t in struc- tural equation models . In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDon- ald (pp. 225 -340 ). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, S.-T.
Affiliations
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Cheng, S.-T.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
64B
Issue
1
Pages
45-54
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2161156243
Cited by
162
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
generativity, old age, perceived respect, younger generation, generative concern, goal disengagement, psychological well-being, older adults, intergenerational attitudes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Community Participation, Creativity, Culture, Decision Making, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Prejudice, Quality of Life, Set, Psychology, Social Perception, Social Support, Intergenerational Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review