Cited by 325Aging and Gerontology ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health Research Topics

Seeking Pleasure and Seeking Pain: Differences in Prohedonic and Contra-Hedonic Motivation From Adolescence to Old Age

Open access
Riediger, Michaela, Schmiedek, Florian, Wagner, Gert G., Lindenberger, Ulman·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

Using a mobile-phone-based experience-sampling technology in a sample of 378 individuals ranging from 14 to 86 years of age, we investigated age differences in how people want to influence their feelings in their daily lives. Contra-hedonic motivations of wanting either to maintain or enhance negative affect or to dampen positive affect were most prevalent in adolescence, whereas prohedonic motivations of wanting either to maintain, but not enhance, positive affect or to dampen negative affect were most prevalent in old age. This pattern was mirrored by an age-related increase in self-reported day-to-day emotional well-being. Analyses of the emotional experiences that accompanied prohedonic and contra-hedonic motivations are consistent with the notions that contra-hedonic motivations are more likely to serve utilitarian than hedonic functions, and that people are more likely to be motivated to maintain negative affect when it is accompanied by positive affect. Implications for understanding affective development are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02473.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riediger, M., Schmiedek, F., Wagner, G. G., & Lindenberger, U.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Riediger, Michaela
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-12
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
1529-1535
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2120541629
Cited by
325
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EconStor Open Access Articles (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
age differences, emotional development, emotional well-being, negative affect, positive affect, adolescence, old age, everyday emotions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emotions, Female, Humans, Human Development, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Motivation, Pain, Pleasure-Pain Principle, Regression Analysis, Self Efficacy, Young Adult, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review