Cited by 57Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Which ‘Working’ Components of Working Memory aren’t Working in Youth with ADHD?

Open access
Fosco, Whitney D., Kofler, Michael J., Groves, Nicole B., Chan, Elizabeth S. M., Raiker, Joseph S.·2020·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Despite replicated evidence for working memory deficits in youth with ADHD, no study has comprehensively assessed all three primary 'working' subcomponents of the working memory system in these children. Children ages 8-13 with (n = 45) and without (n = 41) ADHD (40% female; M age = 10.5; 65% Caucasian/Non-Hispanic) completed a counterbalanced battery of nine tasks (three per construct) assessing working memory reordering (maintaining and rearranging information in mind), updating (active monitoring of incoming information and replacing outdated with relevant information), and dual-processing (maintaining information in mind while performing a secondary task). Detailed analytic plans were preregistered. Bayesian t-tests indicated that, at the group level, children with ADHD exhibited significant impairments in working memory reordering (BF 10 = 4.64 × 10 5; d = 1.34) and updating (BF 10 = 9.49; d = 0.64), but not dual-processing (BF 01 = 1.33; d = 0.37). Overall, 67%-71% of youth with ADHD exhibited impairment in at least one central executive working memory domain. Reordering showed the most ADHD-related impairment, with 75% classified as below average or impaired, and none demonstrating strengths. The majority of children with ADHD (52%-57%) demonstrated average or better abilities in the remaining two domains, with a notable minority demonstrating strengths in updating (8%) and dual-processing (20%). Notably, impairments in domain-general central executive working memory, rather than individual subcomponents, predicted ADHD severity, suggesting that common rather than specific working memory mechanisms may be central to understanding ADHD symptoms. These impairment estimates extend prior work by providing initial evidence that children with ADHD not only exhibit heterogeneous profiles across cognitive domains but also exhibit significant heterogeneity within subcomponents of key cognitive processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-020-00621-y

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory test deficits are consistently among the largest executive function deficits in youth with ADHD, with some meta-analytic estimates as high as d=0.69-0.74.

    “Deficits on tests on tests intended to measure working memory are consistently among the largest deficits of any executive function component54 in studies of youth with ADHD, with some meta-analytic estimates as high as d=0.69–0.74.55”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The paper states that children with ADHD show large differences from typically developing peers on working-memory tasks (opening overview, page unavailable). It does not compare those deficits with other executive-function components to establish that they are consistently among the largest. The d=0.69–0.74 meta-analytic estimate has a separate citation in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findings consistently show lower performance on the working memory index (WMI) and processing speed index (PSI) in ADHD.

    “Findings consistently show lower performance on the working memory index (WMI), which reflects the ability to actively manipulate information, and on the processing speed index (PSI), associated with the speed and automatization of cognitive processes [24, 25, 26].”

    From ADHD, Subtypes and Cognitive Performance: WISC-V as a Support Tool for Diagnostic Assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results (Diagnostic Group Differences; page unavailable) report lower performance in working-memory reordering and updating among children with ADHD. The paper does not report WMI or PSI scores, so it supports the working-memory portion of the claim but not the assertion about lower performance on both named indexes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Set shifting has been understudied compared with working memory and inhibitory control in youth with ADHD and is associated with relatively smaller effect sizes (youth d=0.35, preschool d=0.26).

    “Set shifting has been understudied compared to working memory and inhibitory control among youth with ADHD, and has been associated with relatively smaller effect sizes (youth d=0.35, preschool d=0.26)54,60.”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Abstract reports effect sizes for working-memory reordering, updating, and dual-processing, not set shifting. Searches for set shifting, its comparison with working memory and inhibitory control, and the stated youth and preschool effect sizes found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Youth with ADHD show inhibitory control test deficits with medium effect sizes (d=0.52) compared with neurotypical youth, and preschoolers with elevated ADHD symptoms show small-to-medium deficits (d=0.49).

    “Youth with ADHD show deficits on tests intended to measure inhibitory control, with medium effect sizes (d=0.52)54 compared to neurotypical youth, and preschoolers with elevated ADHD symptoms show small-to-medium deficits overall (d=0.49).60”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    Citation 54 is attached to the inhibitory-control claim, not the separate preschooler claim cited to 60. The Discussion > Limitations passage mentions inhibitory control only as a topic for future work; the paper’s reported effect sizes concern working-memory components. Searches for inhibitory-control deficits and d=0.52 found no passage supporting the attributed result. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kaufman AS & Kaufman NL. (2014). Technical and Interpretive Manual: Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (3rd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
  2. Reynolds CR, & Kamphaus RW. (2015). Behavior assessment system for children–Third Edition (BASC-3). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
  3. Wechsler D. (2014). WISC-V: Technical and interpretive manual. NCS Pearson, Incorporated.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fosco, W. D., Kofler, M. J., Groves, N. B., Chan, E. S. M., & Raiker, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Fosco, Whitney D.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2020-01-27
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
647-660
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W3004359024
Cited by
55
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34 MH102499-01, R01 MH115048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, working memory, working memory updating, dual processing, central executive, children and adolescents, ADHD symptom severity, cognitive heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review