Cited by 27Cholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCellular transport and secretion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 44 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Adaptor protein Disabled-2 modulates low density lipoprotein receptor synthesis in fibroblasts from patients with autosomal recessive hypercholesterolaemia

Open access
Eden, E. R., Sun, X.-M., Patel, D. D., Soutar, A. K.·2007·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolaemia (ARH), characterized clinically by severe inherited hypercholesterolaemia, is caused by recessive null mutations in LDLRAP1 (formerly ARH). Immortalized lymphocytes and monocyte-macrophages, and presumably hepatocytes, from ARH patients fail to take up and degrade plasma low density lipoproteins (LDL) because they lack LDLRAP1, a cargo-specific adaptor required for clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor. Surprisingly, LDL-receptor function is normal in ARH patients' skin fibroblasts in culture. Disabled-2 (Dab2) has been implicated previously in clathrin-mediated internalization of LDL-receptor family members, and we show here that Dab2 is highly expressed in skin fibroblasts, but not in lymphocytes. SiRNA-depletion of Dab2 profoundly reduced LDL-receptor activity in ARH fibroblasts as a result of profound reduction in LDL-receptor protein, but not mRNA; heterologous expression of murine Dab2 reversed this effect. In contrast, LDL-receptor protein content was unchanged in Dab-2-depleted control cells. Incorporation of 35S-labelled amino acids into LDL receptor protein revealed a corresponding apparent reduction in accumulation of newly synthesized LDL-receptor protein on depletion of Dab2 in ARH, but not in control, cells. This reduction in LDL-receptor protein in Dab2-depleted ARH cells could not be reversed by treatment of the cells with proteasomal or lysosomal inhibitors. Thus, we propose a novel role for Dab2 in ARH fibroblasts, where it is apparently required to allow normal translation of LDL receptor mRNA.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In ARH fibroblasts lacking LDLRAP1, siRNA depletion of Dab2 markedly reduces LDL-receptor protein and LDL uptake, while control fibroblasts are largely unaffected. The data suggest Dab2 is required in ARH fibroblasts for normal LDL-receptor synthesis, likely at the level of translation, rather than for LDL-receptor internalization.

Key findings

  • Dab2 protein was highly expressed in cultured normal skin fibroblasts but barely detectable in normal EBV-lymphocytes; LDLRAP1 was detectable in both cell types.
  • Dab2 depletion in ARH fibroblasts reduced saturable 125I-LDL uptake to 28 ± 4% of non-targeting siRNA controls, whereas control fibroblasts showed only a slight reduction to 86 ± 2%; degradation reflected uptake.
  • Dab2 depletion reduced LDL-receptor protein by up to 75% in ARH cells but little or not at all in control cells; LDL-receptor mRNA was unchanged, and expression of murine Dab2-GFP restored LDL-receptor protein in 28 counted cells, whereas GFP alone did not restore it in any of 32 cells.
  • 35S-labelled amino acid incorporation into mature LDL receptor in Dab2-depleted ARH cells was 45.2 ± 18.9% of control siRNA at 4 h chase and 33.5 ± 14.7% at 8 h chase; corresponding control-cell values were 91.3 ± 4.7% and 93.8 ± 2.8%. Proteasomal or lysosomal inhibitors did not reverse the reduction.

Methods

  • Cultured human skin fibroblasts from control subjects and ARH patients, EBV-transformed lymphocytes, and CHO ldlA7 cells were used; ARH fibroblasts included cells homozygous for Q136X or W22X and cells heterozygous for a large deletion of approximately exons 6–9 and insC620.
  • Dab2 and AP2-α were depleted with siRNA; effects were assessed by immunoblotting, quantitative real-time RT-PCR for LDL-receptor mRNA, confocal microscopy, 125I-LDL uptake and degradation assays, 125I-transferrin uptake assays, and 35S-methionine/cysteine pulse-chase immunoprecipitation of LDL receptor.
  • Main comparisons were between non-targeting siRNA and Dab2 or AP2-α siRNA in control versus ARH fibroblasts, with densitometry and phosphorimaging quantification.

Limitations

  • The authors state that their original aim—determining whether Dab2 facilitates LDL-receptor internalization in ARH fibroblasts—could not be resolved from their data because LDL-receptor protein was reduced.
  • The authors state they cannot exclude the possibility that proteolytic pathways were induced that were unaffected by the protease inhibitors tested, and they note that extensive studies will be required to address the mechanism.
  • The authors report that precursor conversion could not be accurately quantified in Dab2-depleted ARH cells because radioactivity in precursor bands was insufficient; the text also makes evident that key experiments used fibroblasts from two control subjects and two ARH patients, and that AP2-α knockdown was incomplete.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddm232

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Depletion of Dab2 in control fibroblasts resulted in a slight reduction in uptake of 125I-LDL to 86±2% of that in cells transfected with a non-targeting siRNA.

    “In three separate experiments, depletion of Dab2 in control fibroblasts resulted in a slight reduction in uptake of LDL to 86 + 2% of that in cells transfected with a non-targeting siRNA (Fig. 2A, filled triangles versus filled circles).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The rate of incorporation of 35S-labelled amino acids into LDL-receptor protein was greatly reduced in Dab2-depleted ARH cells.

    “However, the rate of incorporation of 35 S-labelled amino acids into LDL-receptor protein was greatly reduced in Dab2-depleted ARH cells (Fig. 4D, compare open and closed symbols).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Treatment of ARH cells with proteasomal inhibitor MG132 (20 mM for 8 h) or solvent vehicle DMSO had no influence on LDL-receptor protein content of ARH cells treated with control siRNA or cells depleted of Dab2.

    “As shown in Figure 5A, treatment of ARH cells with the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 (20 mM for 8 h) or the equivalent volume of solvent vehicle DMSO, as indicated above the gel image, had no influence on the LDL-receptor protein content of ARH cells treated with control siRNA, (left two lanes) or cells depleted of Dab2 (right two lanes).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Over-expression of a murine Dab2 construct not targeted by the siRNA reversed the loss of LDL receptor protein in these cells.

    “We confirmed this by our observation that over-expression of a murine Dab2 construct not targeted by the siRNA reversed the loss of LDL receptor protein in these cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Incubation of siRNA-treated ARH cells with leupeptin (100mM for 20 h) had no effect on LDL receptor protein content.

    “To determine whether other protease inhibitors had any effect on LDL receptor protein content in Dab2-depleted ARH cells, we also incubated siRNA-treated ARH cells with leupeptin (100mM for 20 h) and found no effect (Fig. 5C, compare lanes 7 and 8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 31
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Dab2 depletion results in reduction of LDLR protein in ARH fibroblasts but not in normal fibroblasts.

    “we have demonstrated that Dab2 depletion results in the reduction of LDLR protein in ARH fibroblasts but not in normal fibroblasts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Mean incorporation of 35S-labelled amino acids into mature LDL receptor protein in Dab2-depleted ARH cells was 45.2±18.9% of control siRNA after 4h chase and 33.5±14.7% after 8h chase; same values for control cells were 91.3±4.7 and 93.8±2.8%.

    “Mean (+SD, n ¼ 3) incorporation of 35 S-labelled amino acids into mature LDL receptor protein in Dab2-depleted ARH cells was 45.2 + 18.9% of that in cells treated with control siRNA after 4 h chase and 33.5 + 14.7% after 8 h chase; the same values for control cells were 91.3 + 4.7 and 93.8 + 2.8%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Leupeptin was having some effect on protein degradation in these cells because Dab2 protein levels increased slightly in both control and ARH cells treated with control siRNA.

    “Leupeptin was clearly having some effect on protein degradation in these cells because Dab2 protein levels increased slightly in both control and ARH cells treated with control siRNA (Fig. 5C, compare lanes 1 and 2; lanes 5 and 6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Depletion of AP2-a in control fibroblasts did not affect LDL uptake, but in ARH fibroblasts it slightly reduced LDL uptake to 76±4% of that in cells transfected with a non-targeting siRNA.

    “As shown by the open triangles in Figure 2A and B, LDL uptake was not affected by this partial depletion of AP2 in control fibroblasts, but in ARH fibroblasts, it was slightly reduced compared with that in cells transfected with a non-targeting siRNA (to 76 + 4%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Degradation of 125I-LDL reflected uptake in both control and ARH fibroblasts, showing that residual uptake by ARH cells was not due solely to binding to LDL receptors on the cell surface.

    “Degradation of 125 I-LDL reflected uptake in both control (Fig. 2C) and ARH (Fig. 2D) fibroblasts, showing that residual uptake by ARH cells was not due solely to binding to LDL receptors on the cell surface.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Dab2 depletion had very little effect on Tf uptake in control cells, but in ARH cells, it was reduced to 64% of that in cells transfected with non-targeting siRNA.

    “Dab2 depletion had very little effect on Tf uptake in control cells (Fig. 6A, closed triangles), but in ARH cells, it was reduced to 64% of that in cells transfected with a non-targeting siRNA (Fig. 6B, closed triangles).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Expression of GFP did not restore LDL-receptor protein in any of 32 cells counted, but all GFP-Dab2-expressing cells also contained LDL receptor protein (28 cells counted).

    “Expression of GFP did not restore LDL-receptor protein in any of 32 cells counted, but all GFP-Dab2-expressing cells also contained LDL receptor protein (28 cells counted).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Dab2 protein is highly expressed in cultured normal skin fibroblasts, whereas it is barely detectable in normal EBV-lymphocytes.

    “Immunoblotting of whole cell extracts revealed high levels of Dab2 protein in cultured normal skin fibroblasts, whereas it was barely detectable in normal EBV-lymphocytes (Fig. 1A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Confocal microscopy confirmed that siRNA depletion of Dab2 had no effect on LDL receptor protein in control cells, but had a profound effect in ARH cells.

    “Confocal microscopy of cells stained with fluorescently labelled antibodies confirmed that while siRNA depletion of Dab2 had no effect on LDL receptor protein in control cells (data not shown), it had a profound effect in ARH cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    A slight reduction in Tf receptor expression was observed in ARH cells depleted of Dab2.

    “Interestingly, we also observed a slight reduction in Tf receptor expression in ARH cells depleted of Dab2 (Fig. 6); it is worth noting, however, that other proteins involved in trafficking were unaffected, for example, expression of two subunits of AP2 was unchanged by depletion of Dab2 (Fig. 1C and D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Dab2 knockdown resulted in significant reduction of LDL-receptor protein in ARH cells but not in control cells.

    “Dab2 knockdown, however, resulted in significant reduction of LDL-receptor protein in ARH cells but not in control cells (Fig. 3A).”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “In contrast, LDL-receptor protein content was unchanged in Dab-2-depleted control cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Depletion of Dab2 with two different siRNA in cells from two control subjects and two ARH patients with different mutations confirmed a decrease in LDL-receptor protein of up to 75% in ARH cells, but little or no change in cells from control subjects.

    “Depletion of Dab2 with two different siRNA in cells from two control subjects and two ARH patients with different mutations confirmed a decrease in LDL-receptor protein of up to 75% in ARH cells, but little or no change in cells from control subjects (Fig. 3B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    EBV-transformed lymphocytes from ARH patients fail to internalize the LDL receptor, while Tf-receptor mediated uptake and recycling of 125I-Tf occurs normally.

    “Epstein -Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphocytes isolated from ARH patients fail to internalize the LDL receptor, while Tf-receptor mediated uptake and recycling of 125 I-Tf occurs normally, suggesting that the internalization defect does not affect all clathrin-mediated endocytosis, but rather is specific for the LDL receptor (3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Either LDL-receptor protein synthesis was reduced or newly synthesized protein was rapidly degraded.

    “Thus, either LDL-receptor protein synthesis was reduced or newly synthesized protein was rapidly degraded.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Treatment of Dab2-depleted ARH cells with several different inhibitors of protein degradation had no effect on their LDL-receptor protein content, suggesting that rapid degradation of newly synthesized protein was also unlikely.

    “However, we found that treatment of the Dab2-depleted ARH cells with several different inhibitors of protein degradation had no effect on their LDL-receptor protein content (Fig. 5A and C), suggesting that rapid degradation of newly synthesized protein was also unlikely.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    Both Dab2 siRNAs were effective in reducing Dab2 protein under conditions that resulted in 85-95% transfection efficiency, but a more complete knockdown was achieved using siDab2-02.

    “Both Dab2 siRNAs were effective in reducing Dab2 protein under conditions that resulted in 85 -95% transfection efficiency, but a more complete knockdown was achieved using siDab2-02.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    LDL-receptor internalization is severely disrupted in EBV-lymphocytes, monocyte macrophages, and presumably liver of ARH patients, but appears to occur normally in patients' skin fibroblasts in culture.

    “A puzzling feature of LDLRAP1 is that while LDL-receptor internalization is severely disrupted in EBV-lymphocytes (3,9), monocyte macrophages (4) and, presumably, liver of ARH patients, it appears to occur normally in patients' skin fibroblasts in culture (4,10,11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [10]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Dab2 binds the NPVY motif found in the LDL receptor, interacts directly with phosphoinositides, and binds both clathrin triskelia and the a-adaptin subunit of AP2.

    “Disabled-2 (Dab2) is an alternative PTB domain-containing protein that, like LDLRAP1, binds the NPVY motif found in the LDL receptor, interacts directly with phosphoinositides (12) and binds both clathrin triskelia and the a-adaptin subunit of AP2 (13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [13]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    LDLRAP1 demonstrates all the features of a cargo-specific adaptor protein and is now widely viewed as an LDL receptor-specific endocytic adaptor protein.

    “Thus, LDLRAP1 demonstrates all the features of a cargo-specific adaptor protein and is now widely viewed as an LDL receptor-specific endocytic adaptor protein.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All samples and standards were assayed in triplicate.

    “All samples and standards were assayed in triplicate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The reduction in LDL receptor activity in Dab2-depleted cells resulted from the marked reduction in LDL-receptor protein content, but a similar reduction could not account for the 25% fall in activity in AP2-depleted cells.

    “Thus the reduction in LDL receptor activity in Dab2-depleted cells resulted from the marked reduction in LDL-receptor protein content, but a similar reduction could not account for the 25% fall in activity in AP2-depleted cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    A non-targeting siRNA had no effect on Dab2 expression in control or ARH cells, and depletion of Dab2 had no effect on the expression of AP2-a or -m2.

    “A non-targeting siRNA had no effect on Dab2 expression in control or ARH cells (Fig. 1C and D) and depletion of Dab2 had no effect on the expression of AP2-a or -m2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In HeLa cells, simultaneous siRNA-mediated reduction of both LDLRAP1 and Dab-2 results in impaired LDL receptor mediated internalization of LDL and accumulation of LDL receptor protein at the cell surface.

    “Recently, it has been shown that in HeLa cells, simultaneous siRNA-mediated reduction of both LDLRAP1 and Dab-2 results in impaired LDL receptor mediated internalization of LDL and accumulation of LDL receptor protein at the cell surface (17,18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [18]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    A protective role has been proposed by others for Dab1, the neuronal counterpart and structural homologue of Dab2, which has been reported to chaperone VLDL receptor and ApoER2 to the cell surface.

    “Such a protective role has been proposed by others for Dab1, the neuronal counterpart and structural homologue of Dab2, which has been reported to chaperone the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor and apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) to the cell surface (28).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    siRNA targeting of m2 prevents uptake of 125I-Tf in HeLa cells.

    “Indeed siRNA targeting of m2 has been shown by others to prevent uptake of 125 I-Tf in HeLa cells (24,25).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data shown in Figure 2 are the mean of three separate experiments plus SEM.

    “the data shown are the mean of three separate experiments +SEM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    For each experiment, cells from one well of a six-well plate were assayed for knockdown efficiency by immunoblotting of whole cell extracts with appropriate antibodies.

    “For each experiment, cells from one well of a six-well plate were assayed for knockdown efficiency by immunoblotting of whole cell extracts with appropriate antibodies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Saturable uptake and degradation of LDL was determined in duplicate dishes.

    “Saturable uptake (A and B) and degradation (C and D) of LDL was determined in duplicate dishes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    The overall rate of incorporation of radioactivity into total cell protein was not different between control and ARH cells and was not affected by Dab2-depletion.

    “The overall rate of incorporation of radioactivity into total cell protein was not different between the control and ARH cells and was not affected by Dab2-depletion (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Depletion of AP2 with siRNA directed to m2-subunit has been shown by others to reduce markedly uptake of Tf by HeLa cells.

    “Depletion of AP2 with siRNA directed to the m2-subunit has been shown by others to reduce markedly the uptake of Tf by HeLa cells (24,25).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data shown in Figure 6 are the mean of duplicate values in three separate experiments.

    “Data shown are the mean of duplicate values in three separate experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Efficient knockdown of Dab2 severely disrupted LDL uptake in ARH fibroblasts that lack LDLRAP1, but since this was accompanied by a corresponding reduction in LDL receptor protein, the role of Dab2 in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor in skin fibroblasts remains unresolved.

    “Efficient knockdown of Dab2 (Fig. 1) severely disrupted LDL uptake in ARH fibroblasts that lack LDLRAP1 (Fig. 2), but since this was accompanied by a corresponding reduction in LDL receptor protein (Fig. 3), the role of Dab2 in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor in skin fibroblasts remains unresolved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    LDLRAP1-deficient mice develop hypercholesterolaemia and exhibit defective internalization of LDL receptors in their hepatocytes in vivo.

    “Moreover, LDLRAP1deficient mice develop hyper-cholesterolaemia and exhibit defective internalization of LDL receptors in their hepatocytes in vivo (5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    In HeLa cells, depletion of LDLRAP1 and AP2 had no measurable effect on LDL-receptor internalization as long as Dab2 was present.

    “others have found that depletion of LDLRAP1 and AP2 apparently had no measurable effect on LDL-receptor internalization in these cells as long as Dab2 was present (17,18).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [18]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Transfection efficiency was optimized using siGLO.

    “Transfection efficiency was optimized using siGLO (RISC-Free siRNA).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Conditions for transfection were optimized with fluorescently labelled siRNA.

    “Conditions for transfection were optimized with fluorescently labelled siRNA (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In HeLa cells, simultaneous depletion of Dab2 and LDLRAP1 with siRNA resulted in decreased uptake of fluorescently labelled LDL and accumulation of LDL-receptor protein on the cell surface.

    “In these cells, simultaneous depletion of Dab2 and LDLRAP1 with siRNA resulted in decreased uptake of fluorescently labelled LDL and accumulation of LDL-receptor protein on the cell surface (17,18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [18]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    It was not possible to determine whether the proportion of precursor converted to mature receptor was affected because radioactivity in precursor bands was insufficient to permit accurate quantification in Dab2-depleted ARH cells and no accumulation of precursor protein was evident on autoradiographs.

    “It was not possible to determine whether the proportion of precursor converted to mature receptor was affected because the radioactivity in precursor bands was insufficient to permit accurate quantification in Dab2-depleted ARH cells and no accumulation of precursor protein was evident on autoradiographs (Fig. 4B, lower panel).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Mutations in the AP2 binding site of LDLRAP1 did not prevent LDLRAP1-mediated clustering of LDL receptor in clathrin-coated pits unless the binding sites for clathrin were also disrupted.

    “Others have observed that mutations in the AP2 binding site of LDLRAP1 did not prevent LDLRAP1mediated clustering of LDL receptor in clathrin-coated pits unless the binding sites for clathrin were also disrupted (32).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Although uptake of both Tf and LDL receptors is dependent on clathrin-mediated endocytosis, the internalization of these cargos involves distinct mechanisms.

    “there is a body of evidence to suggest that although uptake of both Tf and LDL receptors is dependent on clathrin-mediated endocytosis, the internalization of these cargos involves distinct mechanisms (3,24,30,31).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data shown in Figure 3B are the mean of three separate experiments plus SEM.

    “The data shown are the mean of three separate experiments +SEM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Dab2 has been implicated as an endocytic adaptor for other members of the LDL-receptor family such as apoER2 and megalin.

    “Moreover, Dab2 has been implicated as an endocytic adaptor for other members of the LDL-receptor family such as the apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (apoER2) (14) and megalin (15,16).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [16]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Retroviral expression of wild-type human LDLRAP1 in an EBV-lymphocyte cell line from an ARH patient restored LDL-receptor internalization, confirming that LDLRAP1 is required specifically for clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor in these cells.

    “Retroviral expression of wild-type human LDLRAP1 in an EBV-lymphocyte cell line from an ARH patient restored LDL-receptor internalization, confirming that LDLRAP1 is # 2007 The Author(s) required specifically for clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor in these cells (4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Quantitative real-time RT-PCR found no associated change in LDLR mRNA in Dab2-depleted ARH cells; the reduction in LDL receptor protein is therefore likely to be the result of increased degradation or reduced translation rather than decreased transcription.

    “In addition, we found by quantitative real-time RT -PCR that there was no associated change in LDLR mRNA in Dab2-depleted ARH cells; the reduction in LDL receptor protein is therefore likely to be the result of increased degradation or reduced translation rather than decreased transcription.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The LDL receptor is synthesized in the ER as a precursor with an apparent molecular mass of 120 KDa; within 30 min, it is transported to the Golgi complex where post-translational modifications result in the production of mature protein with increased apparent molecular mass (160 KDa).

    “The LDL receptor is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as a precursor with an apparent molecular mass of 120 KDa.Within 30 min, it is transported to the Golgi complex where post-translational modifications result in the production of mature protein with increased apparent molecular mass (160 KDa) (27).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

45 of 45

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expression of Dab2 in polarized epithelial cells in developing circumventricular organs may be consistent with the functions of Dab2 in mediating endocytic trafficking of clathrin-coated vesicles and in directing cell surface positioning.

    “Expression of Dab2 in polarized epithelial cells in developing circumventricular organs may be consistent with the well-documented functions of Dab2 in mediating endocytic trafficking of clathrin-coated vesicles [58,59], and in directing cell surface positioning [60].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting LPDS incubation times for LDL uptake assay

    Major

    The Figure 2 caption says cells spent a further 40 hours in LPDS-containing medium before the LDL assay, whereas the methods specify 16-18 hours for LDL uptake and degradation measurements.

  • Figure 6 gives a different denominator for Tf uptake

    Minor

    The Figure 6 caption says uptake was expressed as a percentage of counts in the lysate, but the assay methods say intracellular counts were expressed as a percentage of total counts recovered across the medium, acid wash and lysate.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bonifacino, J.S. (1998) TCA precipitation to determine label incorporation (unit 10.18.7). In Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A. and Struhl, K. (eds), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley & Sons, NY, Vol. 2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eden, E. R., Sun, X.-M., Patel, D. D., & Soutar, A. K.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Soutar, A. K.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2007-06-27
Volume
16
Issue
22
Pages
2751-2759
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2154736856
Cited by
27
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
Disabled-2, LDLRAP1, LDL receptor, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, dermal fibroblasts, mRNA translation, siRNA knockdown
MeSH terms
Animals, Cricetulus, Endocytosis, Fibroblasts, Genes, Recessive, Cricetinae, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Lymphocytes, Receptors, LDL, RNA, Messenger, Skin, Transcription, Genetic, Case-Control Studies, CHO Cells, Adaptor Protein Complex 2, RNA, Small Interfering, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review