The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time to pregnancy and semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European cities
Abstract
Background In fertile populations, little is known about the association between semen parameters and time to pregnancy (TTP). Methods Pregnant women from Copenhagen, Edinburgh, Paris and Turku who conceived without medical intervention were asked for their TTP (942 couples), and their partners provided a semen sample. The proportion of morphologically normal sperm and the multiple anomalies index (MAI, ratio of the total number of anomalies to the number of abnormal sperm) were centrally estimated. We estimated rate ratios for the occurrence of a pregnancy by a discrete survival model, adjusted for sexual activity and female factors affecting fecundity. Results Increasing sperm concentration influenced TTP up to 55 x 10(6)/ml. The proportion of morphologically normal sperm influenced TTP up to 39% according to David's criteria, and this association held among the subjects with a sperm concentration >55 x 10(6)/ml. For strict criteria, the threshold value was 19% normal sperm. An increase of 0.5 in MAI was associated with an adjusted rate ratio for the occurrence of a pregnancy of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.85). Conclusions These results highlight the importance of sperm morphology parameters and indicate that the effect of proportion of normal sperm on TTP may be independent of sperm concentration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epidemiological studies comparing fertile men whose partners achieved natural pregnancy and infertile men have demonstrated that sperm morphology was correlated with the chances of natural pregnancy [1, 2, 3].”
From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“In these studies, although correlations were observed between morphology and natural fertility, the predictive value of sperm parameters for detecting infertility was low.”
From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The MAI [3, 70] and the TZI were correlated with fertility in vivo, but their sensitivity and specificity were mediocre (< 75%).”
From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Despite efforts to standardize methodology for grading sperm morphology, publications examining the impact morphology on spontaneous pregnancy, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization reach varying conclusions (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10).”
From Poor reproducibility of percentage of normally shaped sperm using the World Health Organization Fifth Edition strict grading criteria (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years.
Carlsen, E., Giwercman, A., Keiding, N., & Skakkebæk, N. E. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6854.609 · Cited by 2,768
Lamb, D. J. (2000) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03272.x · Cited by 2,081
Multivariate Statistical Modelling Based on Generalized Linear Models
Fahrmeir, L., & Tutz, G. (1994) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0010-4 · Cited by 1,413
Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization
Kruger, T. F., Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Lombard, C. J., Van der Merwe, J. P., van Zyl, J. A., & Smith, K. (1986) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49891-2 · Cited by 1,208
Decline in Semen Quality among Fertile Men in Paris during the Past 20 Years
Auger, J., Kunstmann, J. M., Czyglik, F., & Jouannet, P. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199502023320501 · Cited by 1,131
Bonde, J. P. E., Ernst, E., Jensen, T. K., Hjollund, N. H. I., Kolstad, H., Scheike, T., Giwercman, A., Skakkebæk, N. E., Henriksen, T. B., & Olsen, J. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10514-1 · Cited by 791
The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934-1996.
Swan, S. H., Elkin, E. P., & Fenster, L. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108961 · Cited by 708
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677
Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss
Zinaman, M. J., Clegg, E. D., Brown, C., O’Connor, J., & Selevan, S. G. (1996) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58144-8 · Cited by 606
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics*‡
Cooper, T. G., Noonan, E., von Eckardstein, S., Auger, J., Baker, H. W. G., Behre, H. M., Haugen, T. B., Kruger, T., Wang, C., Mbizvo, M. T., et al. (2010) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp048 · Cited by 2,827
State-of-the-science of endocrine disrupting chemicals, 2012
Bergman, Å., Heindel, J., Jobling, S., Kidd, K., & Zoeller, R. T. (2012) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.020 · Cited by 1,388
Skakkebæk, N. E., Meyts, E. R., Louis, G. M. B., Toppari, J., Andersson, A., Eisenberg, M. L., Jensen, T. K., Jørgensen, N., Swan, S. H., Sapra, K. J., et al. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2015 · Cited by 1,030
Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormonesamong 1,558 Danish men
Jensen, T. K., Andersson, A., Jørgensen, N., Andersen, A., Carlsen, E., Petersen, J. H., & Skakkebæk, N. E. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.056 · Cited by 839
Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the 'black box' of early pregnancy loss
Macklon, N. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.4.333 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Slama, R.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Slama, R.
- ORCID
- Slama, R.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 503-515
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2135968453
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- time to pregnancy, semen parameters, sperm concentration, sperm morphology, spontaneous conception, fertility, fecundability
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Female, Fertility, Fertilization, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Probability, Semen, Sperm Count, Spermatozoa, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
