Cited by 160Ovarian function and disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Prevalence and implications of anxiety in polycystic ovary syndrome: results of an internet-based survey in Germany

Benson, S., Hahn, S., Tan, S., Mann, K., Janssen, O.E., Schedlowski, M., Elsenbruch, S.·2009·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparatively little attention has been paid to the symptoms of anxiety in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), although anxiety disorders constitute the most common psychiatric diagnoses among endocrine patients and in the general population. Therefore, our goal was to address the prevalence, determinants and implications of anxiety alone or anxiety in combination with depression in German women with PCOS. METHODS: In this nation-wide, internet-based survey, anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) and quality of life (SF-12) were assessed together with sociodemographic information and clinical PCOS symptoms in 448 PCOS women. RESULTS: Of the patients, 34% showed clinically relevant HADS anxiety scores and 21% had clinically relevant HADS depression scores. Quality of life was significantly impaired in PCOS women with anxiety (P < 0.001), in particular, in women with comorbid anxiety and depression (P < 0.001). The risk for clinically relevant HADS anxiety scores was significantly enhanced in PCOS women with acne (odds ratio (OR) = 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-2.52) and an unfulfilled wish to conceive (OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.01-2.23). CONCLUSIONS: PCOS women may be at an increased risk for clinically relevant anxiety, and comorbid anxiety and depression is also very common. Anxiety contributes to impaired quality of life in PCOS. Given the high prevalence and the serious implications, and the availability of effective treatment options given proper diagnosis, clinicians should be more aware of anxiety disorders in women with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dep031

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benson, S., Hahn, S., Tan, S., Mann, K., Janssen, O. E., Schedlowski, M., & Elsenbruch, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Endokrinologikum (DE)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2009-02-16
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1446-1451
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2097466007
Cited by
160
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, anxiety, depression, comorbid depression and anxiety, quality of life, acne, prevalence, psychiatric comorbidity, women's health
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Data Collection, Depression, Female, Germany, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review