Cited by 481Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Diagnostic change and the increased prevalence of autism

Open access
King, Marissa, Bearman, Peter·2009·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased autism prevalence rates have generated considerable concern. However, the contribution of changes in diagnostic practices to increased prevalence rates has not been thoroughly examined. Debates over the role of diagnostic substitution also continue. California has been an important test case in these controversies. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which the increased prevalence of autism in California has been driven by changes in diagnostic practices, diagnostic substitution and diagnostic accretion. METHODS: Retrospective case record examination of 7003 patients born before 1987 with autism who were enrolled with the California Department of Developmental Services between 1992 and 2005 was carried out. Of principal interest were 631 patients with a sole diagnosis of mental retardation (MR) who subsequently acquired a diagnosis of autism. The outcome of interest was the probability of acquiring a diagnosis of autism as a result of changes in diagnostic practices was calculated. The probability of diagnostic change is then used to model the proportion of the autism caseload arising from changing diagnostic practices. RESULTS: The odds of a patient acquiring an autism diagnosis were elevated in periods in which the practices for diagnosing autism changed. The odds of change in years in which diagnostic practices changed were 1.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.54], 1.55 (95% CI 1.03-2.34), 1.58 (95% CI 1.05-2.39), 1.82 (95% CI 1.23-2.7) and 1.61 (95% CI 1.09-2.39). Using the probability of change between 1992 and 2005 to generalize to the population with autism, it is estimated that 26.4% (95% CI 16.25-36.48) of the increased autism caseload in California is uniquely associated with diagnostic change through a single pathway--individuals previously diagnosed with MR. CONCLUSION: Changes in practices for diagnosing autism have had a substantial effect on autism caseloads, accounting for one-quarter of the observed increase in prevalence in California between 1992 and 2005.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyp261

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increase in the number of children reported to have ASD is due to the broadening of diagnostic criteria, first in DSM-IIIR and then in DSM-IV, particularly for PDD-NOS.

    “it has been suggested that the increase in the number of children reported to have ASD is due to the broadening of diagnostic criteria (King & Bearman 2009), first in DSM-IIIR (Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 1987) and then in DSM-IV (Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 1994), particularly for the subtype of pervasive developmental disorders-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS).”

    From Recent Advances in Autism Research as Reflected in DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as King & Bearman 2009

    The Discussion (p. 10) attributes 26.4% of the increased California autism caseload to changing diagnostic practices, substitution and accretion—not the entire increase to broadened criteria. The Introduction (p. 3) discusses DSM revisions, but the Discussion (p. 9) says the study could not adequately estimate effects for people with PDD-NOS alone. The source therefore supports a contribution from diagnostic change, not the claim’s full explanation or its PDD-NOS emphasis. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Factors other than diagnostic drift likely account for more than one-half of new ASD cases.

    “In fact, these studies suggest that factors other than diagnostic drift likely account for more than one-half of new cases.”
  • Independent studies have concluded that the increasing incidence of ASD cannot be explained entirely by increased awareness, broadening of diagnostic criteria, or improved detection.

    “Independent studies have reached the common conclusion that this trend cannot be explained in its entirety by increased awareness, broadening of diagnostic criteria, or improved detection of ASD [ 5–8 ].”
  • Another study suggested that diagnostic substitution and better ascertainment explain only a part of the linear increase observed in the California registry.

    “another study suggested that diagnostic substitution, especially for the most severe cases, and better ascertainment, especially for children at the less severe end of the spectrum, explain only a part of the linear increase observed in the California registry”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 1 Fommbonne E. The prevalence of autism. JAMA 2003; 289: 87-89.
  2. 3 Coo H, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Lloyd J, Kasmara L, Holden J, Lewis S. Trends in autism prevalence: diagnostic substitution revisited. J Autism Dev Disorders 2008; 38: 1036-46.
  3. 4 Gernsbacher MA, Dawson M, Goldsmith HH. Three reasons not to believe in an autism epidemic. Curr Dir Pyschol Sci 2005; 14: 55-58.
  4. 5 Bishop D, Whitehouse A, Watt H, Line E. Autism and diagnostic substitution: evidence from a study of adults with a history of developmental language disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 341-45.
  5. 6 Rutter M. Incidence of autism spectrum disorders: changes over time and their meaning. Acta Pediatr 2005; 94: 2-15.
  6. 7 Shattuck P. Contribution of diagnostic substitution to the growing administrative prevalence of autism. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1028-37.
  7. 8 Wing L, Potter D. The epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders: is prevalence rising. Mental Retard Dev Disab Res Rev 2002; 8: 151-61.
  8. 9 Gurney J, Fritz M, Ness K, Sievers P, Newschaffer C, Shapiro E. Analysis of prevalence trends of autism spectrum disorders in Minnesota. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157: 622-27.
  9. 10 Newschaffer C, Falb M, Gurney J. National autism prevalence trends from United States special education data. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 277-82.
  10. 12 Fombonne E. Is there an autism epidemic. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 411-12.
  11. 1967-1997: results from a population based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159: 37-44.
  12. 14 Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L. The rise in autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology 2009; 20: 84-90.
  13. 15 Croen LA, Grether JK, Hoogstrate J, Selvin S. The changing prevalence of autism in California. J Autism Dev Disord 2002; 32: 207-15.
  14. 17 Croen L, Grether J. Response: a response to Blaxill, Baskin, and Spitzer on Croen et al . (2002), 'the changing prevalence of autism in California'. J Autism Dev Disord 2003; 33: 227-29.
  15. 16 Blaxill M, Baskin D, Spitzer W. Commentary: Blaxill, Baskin, and Spitzer on Croen et al . (2002), the changing prevalence of autism in California. J Autism Dev Disord 2003; 33: 223-26.
  16. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 38 :1234-1238 doi:10.1093/ije/dyp256 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, M., & Bearman, P.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Bearman, Peter
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2009-09-07
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
1224-1234
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2164883603
Cited by
481
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 50
FWCI
18.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003635)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autism prevalence, diagnostic change, intellectual disability, California, developmental services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, California, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review