Cited by 55Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchSpeech Recognition and SynthesisVoice and Speech Disorders

Temporal integration of text transcripts and acoustic features for Alzheimer’s diagnosis based on spontaneous speech

Open access
Martinc, Matej, Haider, Fasih, Pollak, Senja, Luz, Saturnino·2021·Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Abstract

Background:Advances in machine learning (ML) technology have opened new avenues for detection and monitoring of cognitive decline. In this study, a multimodal approach to Alzheimer's dementia detection based on the patient's spontaneous speech is presented. This approach was tested on a standard, publicly available Alzheimer's speech dataset for comparability. The data comprise voice samples from 156 participants (1:1 ratio of Alzheimer's to control), matched by age and gender. Materials and Methods:A recently developed Active Data Representation (ADR) technique for voice processing was employed as a framework for fusion of acoustic and textual features at sentence and word level. Temporal aspects of textual features were investigated in conjunction with acoustic features in order to shed light on the temporal interplay between paralinguistic (acoustic) and linguistic (textual) aspects of Alzheimer's speech. Combinations between several configurations of ADR features and more traditional bag-of-n-grams approaches were used in an ensemble of classifiers built and evaluated on a standardised dataset containing recorded speech of scene descriptions and textual transcripts. Results:Employing only semantic bag-of-n-grams features, an accuracy of 89.58% was achieved in distinguishing between Alzheimer's patients and healthy controls. Adding temporal and structural information by combining bag-of-n-grams features with ADR audio/textual features, the accuracy could be improved to 91.67% on the test set. An accuracy of 93.75% was achieved through late fusion of the three best feature configurations, which corresponds to a 4.7% improvement over the best result reported in the literature for this dataset. Conclusion:The proposed combination of ADR audio and textual features is capable of successfully modelling temporal aspects of the data. The machine learning approach toward dementia detection achieves best performance when ADR features are combined with strong semantic bag-of-n-grams features. This combination leads to state-of-the-art performance on the AD classification task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnagi.2021.642647

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Goodglass H. Kaplan E. Barresi B. (2001). BDAE-3: Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination–Third Edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  2. Pedregosa F. Varoquaux G. Gramfort A. Michel V. Thirion B. Grisel O.. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825– 2830. Available online at: http://jmlr.org/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinc, M., Haider, F., Pollak, S., & Luz, S.
Affiliations
  • Jožef Stefan Institute (SI)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Martinc, Matej
  • Luz, Saturnino
Venue
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Published
2021-06-14
Volume
13
Pages
642647-642647
ISSN
1663-4365 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3170936667
Cited by
55
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease detection, dementia diagnosis, spontaneous speech, multimodal fusion, acoustic features, temporal features, decision fusion, cognitive decline monitoring, paralinguistic features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review