Cited by 82Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationDigital Media and Philosophy

Social media mindsets: a new approach to understanding social media use and psychological well-being

Open access
Lee, Angela Y, Hancock, Jeffrey T·2023·Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract

Social media mindsets are the core beliefs that orient individuals’ expectations, behaviors, attributions, and goals about social media’s role in their lives. In four survey studies (N = 2,179), we show people hold distinct mindsets about the amount of agency they have over their social media use (“in control” vs. “out of control”) and the valence of its effects (“enhancing” vs. “harmful”) that are meaningfully related to psychological well-being. We develop and apply the Social Media Mindsets scale, revealing that agentic, positive mindsets are associated with better well-being and low-agency, and negative mindsets are associated with worse well-being (Studies 1, 2a, and 2b). Notably, these mindsets explained more variance in relational well-being and psychological distress than other measures (Study 3) and were related to differences in how people used social media and interpreted the time they spent on it (Studies 3 and 4). Our findings introduce a novel potential explanation for heterogeneous social media effects on well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jcmc/zmad048

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When people exercise high agency over technologies such as social media, they believe they can control the amount and nature of their use.

    “For example, when people exercise high agency over technologies such as social media, they believe they can control the amount and nature of their use [12].”

    From The Role of Human Agency in Human-AI Co-Creativity (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, A. Y., & Hancock, J. T.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2023-11-08
Volume
29
Issue
1
ISSN
1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392215427
Cited by
82
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 9
FWCI
35.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Stanford Office of Undergraduate Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
psychological well-being, social media use, relational well-being, psychological distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review