Cited by 42Insect Resistance and GeneticsInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Effect of corn hybrids expressing the coleopteran-specific Cry3Bb1 protein for corn rootworm control on aboveground insect predators

Ahmad, Aqeel, Wilde, Gerald E., Whitworth, R. Jeff, Zolnerowich, Gregory·2006·Journal of Economic Entomology

Abstract

Field and laboratory studies were conducted to determine the effect of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn, Zea mays L. (YieldGard Rootworm), expressing the Cry3Bb1 protein on aboveground nontarget insect predators (minute pirate bug, ladybird beetles, and carabids). Visual counts of adult and immature Orius insidiosus (Say), Coleomegilla maculata (DeGeer), Hippodamia convergens Gurin-Meneville, and Scymnus spp. occurring in Bt corn and its non-Bt isoline were made at Manhattan, KS, in 2002 and at Manhattan and Scandia, KS, in 2003. No significant differences were found between the Bt corn and non-Bt isoline plots in the abundance (number per plant) of O. insidiosus, C. maculata, H. convergens, and Scymnus spp. Field predation on Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) egg masses was also observed during the silking stage of corn at Manhattan and Scandia in 2003. No significant differences were observed among treatments in predation rate for predators with chewing versus sucking mouthparts. Two laboratory studies determined the effect of Cry3Bb1 protein expressed in Bt corn pollen on C. maculata and carabids. The larvae of C. maculata were reared on Bt pollen, non-Bt pollen, or greenbugs, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani). The duration of larval and pupal stages, developmental time from egg hatch to adult emergence, percentage of survival, and elytra length were compared among treatments. There were no significant differences in developmental time of larvae fed pollen or greenbugs during their first two instars. However, significantly prolonged development of the third (1 d) and fourth instars (2 d) was observed for larvae fed greenbugs only. Total time for larval development was significantly longer for larvae that fed on greenbugs versus larvae fed on pollen. No significant differences were observed among treatments in the percentage of larvae that pupated or pupal stage duration. Larvae that fed on greenbugs had higher pupal and adult weights compared with pollen-fed larvae. However, pupal and adult weights did not vary between the Bt and non-Bt pollen treatments. No significant differences occurred in longevity and elytra length of beetles among all treatments. Two carabid species, Harpalus caliginosus F. and Harpalus pensylvanicus DeGeer, were reared on moistened dog food sprinkled with Bt or non-Bt corn pollen. No significant differences in mortality of H. caliginosus and H. pensylvanicus were detected among any of the treatments. There was no significant effect of Bt pollen on fecundity and egg viability of H. caliginosus. Our studies showed that YieldGard Rootworm had no effect on the selected coleopteran predators; therefore, this Bt corn hybrid could be used in an integrated pest management system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jee/99.4.1085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of Bt crops on biological control services supplied by generalist arthropod predators has been uniformly neutral in Bt maize and Bt cotton.

    “The impact of Bt crops on the biological control services supplied by generalist arthropod predators have been uniformly neutral in Bt maize (Ahmad et al., 2006) and Bt cotton (Head et al., 2005;Naranjo, 2005b;Olson and Ruberson, 2012;Sisterson et al., 2004).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Ahmad et al., 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, A., Wilde, G. E., Whitworth, R. J., & Zolnerowich, G.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Aqeel
Venue
Journal of Economic Entomology
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
1085-1095
ISSN
  • 0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-291X
OpenAlex
W2175333087
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
maize, non-target effects, Anthocoridae, Orius insidiosus, Coleomegilla maculata, Hippodamia convergens, Scymnus, Coccinellidae, ground beetles, Ostrinia nubilalis, corn rootworm, Schizaphis graminum, larval development
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacillus thuringiensis, Coleoptera, Zea mays, Endotoxins, Female, Fertility, Hemiptera, Larva, Pollen, Predatory Behavior, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review