Cited by 224Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchBRCA gene mutations in cancerGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Prospective Evaluation of Germline Alterations in Patients With Exocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms

Open access
Lowery, Maeve A, Wong, Winston, Jordan, Emmet J, Lee, Jonathan W, Kemel, Yelena, Vijai, Joseph, Mandelker, Diana, Zehir, Ahmet +25 more·2018·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Background: Identification of pathogenic germline alterations (PGAs) has important clinical and therapeutic implications in pancreas cancer. We performed comprehensive germline testing (GT) in an unselected prospective cohort of patients with exocrine pancreatic neoplasms with genotype and phenotype association to facilitate identification of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers and examine potential therapeutic implications. Methods: Six hundred fifteen unselected patients with exocrine pancreatic neoplasms were prospectively consented for somatic tumor and matched sample profiling for 410-468 genes. GT for PGAs in 76 genes associated with cancer susceptibility was performed in an "identified" manner in 356 (57.9%) patients and in an "anonymized" manner in 259 (42.1%) patients, using an institutional review board-approved protocol. Detailed clinical and pathological features, response to platinum, and overall survival (OS) were collected for the identified cohort. OS was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: PGAs were present in 122 (19.8%) of 615 patients involving 24 different genes, including BRCA1/2, ATM, PALB2, and multiple additional genes associated with the DNA damage response pathway. Of 122 patients with germline alterations, 41.8% did not meet current guidelines for GT. The difference in median OS was not statistically significant between patients with and without PGA (50.8 months, 95% confidence interval = 34.5 to not reached, two-sided P = .94). Loss of heterozygosity was found in 60.0% of BRCA1/2. Conclusions: PGAs frequently occur in pancreas exocrine neoplasms and involve multiple genes beyond those previously associated with hereditary pancreatic cancer. These PGAs are therapeutically actionable in about 5% to 10% of patients. These data support routinely offering GT in all pancreatic ductal adenocarcimona patients with a broad panel of known hereditary cancer predisposition genes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djy024

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Krantz BA, Yu KH, O'Reilly EM. Pancreas adenocarcinoma: Novel therapeu- tics. Chin Clin Oncol. 2017;6(3):30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lowery, M. A., Wong, W., Jordan, E. J., Lee, J. W., Kemel, Y., Vijai, J., Mandelker, D., Zehir, A., Capanu, M., Salo-Mullen, E., Arnold, A. G., Yu, K. H., Varghese, A. M., Kelsen, D. P., Brenner, R., Kaufmann, E., Ravichandran, V., Mukherjee, S., Berger, M. F., Hyman, D. M., Klimstra, D. S., Abou-Alfa, G. K., Tjan, C., Covington, C., Maynard, H., Allen, P. J., Askan, G., Leach, S. D., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A., Robson, M. E., Offit, K., Stadler, Z. K., & O’Reilly, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Genomics
  • Department of Pathology
  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
  • Center for Molecular Oncology
  • David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
110
Issue
10
Pages
1067-1074
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2792327545
Cited by
224
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (R25CA020449)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
germline alterations, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, hereditary cancer predisposition genes, BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, DNA damage response, loss of heterozygosity, platinum response, overall survival, actionable mutations
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Germ-Line Mutation, Loss of Heterozygosity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Pancreas, Exocrine, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review