Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of pre-impact spin on the Moon-forming collision

Ruiz-Bonilla, S, Eke, V R, Kegerreis, J A, Massey, R J, Teodoro, L F A·2020·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We simulate the hypothesized collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized impactor that created the Moon. Among the resulting debris disc in some impacts, we find a self-gravitating clump of material. It is roughly the mass of the Moon, contains $\sim 1{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ iron like the Moon, and has its internal composition resolved for the first time. The clump contains mainly impactor material near its core but becomes increasingly enriched in proto-Earth material near its surface. The formation of this Moon-sized clump depends sensitively on the spin of the impactor. To explore this, we develop a fast method to construct models of multilayered, rotating bodies and their conversion into initial conditions for smoothed particle hydrodynamical (SPH) simulations. We use our publicly available code to calculate density and pressure profiles in hydrostatic equilibrium and then generate configurations of over a billion particles with SPH densities within 1 per cent of the desired values. This algorithm runs in a few minutes on a desktop computer, for 107 particles, and allows direct control over the properties of the spinning body. In comparison, alternative relaxation or spin-up techniques take hours on a supercomputer and the structure of the rotating body cannot be known beforehand. Collisions that differ only in the impactor’s initial spin reveal a wide variety of outcomes: a merger, a grazing hit-and-run, or the creation of an orbiting proto-Moon.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/staa3385

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Asphaug, 2014, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 42, 551, 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124057 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Benz, 1987, Icarus, 71, 30, 10.1016/0019-1035(87)90160-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cano, 2020, Nature Geosci., 13, 270, 10.1038/s41561-020-0550-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Canup, 2013, Icarus, 222, 200, 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.10.011 · DOI
  5. Clement, 2019, Icarus, 321, 778, 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.033 · DOI
  6. Ćuk, 2012, Science, 338, 1047, 10.1126/science.1225542 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Greenwood, 2018, Science Advances, 4, 10.1126/sciadv.aao5928 · DOI
  8. Guillot, 2018, Nature, 555, 227, 10.1038/nature25775 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Herwartz, 2014, Science, 344, 1146, 10.1126/science.1251117 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hosono, 2017, PASJ, 69, 26, 10.1093/pasj/psw131 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hubbard, 2012, ApJ, 756, L15, 10.1088/2041-8205/756/1/L15 · DOI
  12. Hubbard, 2013, ApJ, 768, 43, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/43 · DOI
  13. Iess, 2018, Nature, 555, 220, 10.1038/nature25776 · DOI
  14. Iess, 2019, Science, 364, aat2965, 10.1126/science.aat2965 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Imaeda, 2002, ApJ, 569, 501, 10.1086/339320 · DOI
  16. Kegerreis, 2018, ApJ, 861, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac725 · DOI
  17. Kegerreis, 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5029, 10.1093/mnras/stz1606 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kegerreis, 2020, ApJ, 897, 161, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9810 · DOI
  19. Kellogg, 1929, Foundations of Potential Theory, 10.1007/978-3-642-90850-7 · DOI
  20. Kokubo, 2010, ApJ, 714, L21, 10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/L21 · DOI
  21. Kong, 2013, ApJ, 764, 67, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/67 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/764/1/67
  22. Lock, 2017, J. Geophys. Res. (Planets), 122, 950, 10.1002/2016JE005239 · DOI
  23. Lyon, 1992, SESAME: The Los Alamos National Laboratory Equation of State Database
  24. Melosh, 1989, Impact cratering: A geologic process, Oxford monographs on geology and geophysics
  25. Militzer, 2019, ApJ, 879, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab23f0 · DOI
  26. Nakajima, 2015, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, P13C
  27. Raskin, 2016, ApJ, 820, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/102 · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/2/102
  28. Reinhardt, 2017, MNRAS, 467, 4252, 10.1093/mnras/stx322 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Saff, 1997, Math. Int., 19, 5, 10.1007/BF03024331 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Schaller, 2016, Proc. PASC 16, 2:1
  31. Slattery, 1992, Icarus, 99, 167, 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90180-F · DOI
  32. Stewart, 2020, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2272, 080003, 10.1063/12.0000946 · DOI
  33. Tassoul, 1978, Theory of rotating stars
  34. Tillotson, 1962, General Atomic Report GA-3216, 3216
  35. Viswanathan, 2019, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 7295, 10.1029/2019GL082677 · DOI
  36. Wiechert, 2001, Science, 294, 345, 10.1126/science.1063037 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Wisdom, 2016, Icarus, 267, 315, 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.12.030 · DOI
  38. Woolfson, 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1173, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x
  39. Wyatt, 2018, JA&A, 39, 26, 10.1007/s12036-018-9515-8 · DOI
  40. Young, 2016, Science, 351, 493, 10.1126/science.aad0525 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Ruiz-Bonilla, S., Eke, V. R., Kegerreis, J. A., Massey, R. J., & Teodoro, L. F. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2020-12-04
Volume
500
Issue
3
Pages
2861-2870
ISSN
  • 0035-8711
  • 1365-2966
Cited by
27
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/P006744/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/N001494/1, ST/T002565/1)
  • Durham University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of pre-impact spin on the Moon-forming collision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/staa3385
The paper
Ruiz-Bonilla, S., Eke, V. R., Kegerreis, J. A., Massey, R. J., & Teodoro, L. F. A. (2020). The effect of pre-impact spin on the Moon-forming collision. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3385

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.