Cited by 46Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Evolution of galactic planes of satellites in the eagle simulation

Open access
Shao, Shi, Cautun, Marius, Frenk, Carlos S·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We study the formation of planes of dwarf galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass haloes in the eagle galaxy formation simulation. We focus on satellite systems similar to the one in the MW: spatially thin or with a large fraction of members orbiting in the same plane. To characterize the latter, we introduce a robust method to identify the subsets of satellites that have the most coplanar orbits. Out of the 11 MW classical dwarf satellites, 8 have highly clustered orbital planes whose poles are contained within a 22° opening angle centred around (l, b) = (182°, −2°). This configuration stands out when compared to both isotropic and typical ΛCDM satellite distributions. Purely flattened satellite systems are short-lived chance associations and persist for less than $1\, \rm {Gyr}$. In contrast, satellite subsets that share roughly the same orbital plane are longer lived, with half of the MW-like systems being at least $4\, \rm {Gyr}$ old. On average, satellite systems were flatter in the past, with a minimum in their minor-to-major axes ratio about $9\, \rm {Gyr}$ ago, which is the typical infall time of the classical satellites. MW-like satellite distributions have on average always been flatter than the overall population of satellites in MW-mass haloes and, in particular, they correspond to systems with a high degree of anisotropic accretion of satellites. We also show that torques induced by the aspherical mass distribution of the host halo channel some satellite orbits into the host’s equatorial plane, enhancing the fraction of satellites with coplanar orbits. In fact, the orbital poles of coplanar satellites are tightly aligned with the minor axis of the host halo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stz1741

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At larger distances, the flattening of the DM halo becomes important and can affect the dynamics of halo tracers.

    “At larger distances, the flattening of the DM halo becomes important and can affect the dynamics of halo tracers”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Shao et al. 2019b

    Section 4.3.1 (page not supplied) says the host halo’s triaxial shape produces torques that affect satellite orbits, supporting the claim about halo shape and tracer dynamics. It does not establish that this effect becomes important specifically at larger distances. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. R E F E R E N C E S Agustsson I., Brainerd T. G., 2010, ApJ, 709, 1321 · DOI
  2. Ahmed S. H., Brooks A. M., Christensen C. R., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 3119 · DOI
  3. Arnold V. I., Shandarin S. F., Zeldovich I. B., 1982, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 20, 111 · DOI
  4. Aubert D., Pichon C., Colombi S., 2004, MNRAS, 352, 376 · DOI
  5. Bahl H., Baumgardt H., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 2916 · DOI
  6. Banik I., O'Ryan D., Zhao H., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 4768 · DOI
  7. Besla G., Kallivayalil N., Hernquist L., Robertson B., Cox T. J., van der Marel R. P., Alcock C., 2007, ApJ, 668, 949 · DOI
  8. Bowden A., Evans N. W., Belokurov V., 2013, MNRAS, 435, 928 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brainerd T. G., 2005, ApJ, 628, L101 · DOI
  10. Buck T., Macciò A. V., Dutton A. A., 2015, ApJ, 809, 49 · DOI
  11. Buck T., Dutton A. A., Macciò A. V., 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4348 · DOI
  12. Cautun M., Frenk C. S., 2017, MNRAS, 468, L41 · DOI
  13. Cautun M., van de Weygaert R., Jones B. J. T., Frenk C. S., 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2923 · DOI
  14. Cautun M., Deason A. J., Frenk C. S., McAlpine S., 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2185 · DOI
  15. Conn A. R. et al., 2013, ApJ, 766, 120 · DOI
  16. Crain R. A. et al., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1937 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Danovich M., Dekel A., Hahn O., Teyssier R., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1732 · DOI
  18. Davis M., Efstathiou G., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1985, ApJ, 292, 371 · DOI
  19. Deason A. J. et al., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2607 · DOI
  20. Dolag K., Borgani S., Murante G., Springel V., 2009, MNRAS, 399, 497 · DOI
  21. Erkal D., Sanders J. L., Belokurov V., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1590 · DOI
  22. Erkal D. et al., 2018, MNRAS, 481, 3148 · DOI
  23. Fernando N., Arias V., Guglielmo M., Lewis G. F., Ibata R. A., Power C., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 641 · DOI
  24. Fernando N., Arias V., Lewis G. F., Ibata R. A., Power C., 2018, MNRAS, 473, 2212 · DOI
  25. Gaia Collaboration, 2018, A&A, 616, A12 · DOI
  26. Gillet N., Ocvirk P., Aubert D., Knebe A., Libeskind N., Yepes G., Gottlöber S., Hoffman Y., 2015, ApJ, 800, 34 · DOI
  27. Gómez F. A., Besla G., Carpintero D. D., Villalobos Á., O'Shea B. W., Bell E. F., 2015, ApJ, 802, 128 · DOI
  28. González R. E., Padilla N. D., 2016, ApJ, 829, 58 · DOI
  29. Hammer F., Yang Y., Fouquet S., Pawlowski M. S., Kroupa P., Puech M., Flores H., Wang J., 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3543 · DOI
  30. Hodkinson B., Scholtz J., 2019, preprint (arXiv:1904.03192) · arXiv
  31. Ibata R. A. et al., 2013, Nature, 493, 62 · DOI
  32. Jiang L., Helly J. C., Cole S., Frenk C. S., 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2115 · DOI
  33. Kallivayalil N., van der Marel R. P., Besla G., Anderson J., Alcock C., 2013, ApJ, 764, 161 · DOI
  34. Kang X., Mao S., Gao L., Jing Y. P., 2005, A&A, 437, 383 · DOI
  35. Knebe A., Gill S. P. D., Gibson B. K., Lewis G. F., Ibata R. A., Dopita M. A., 2004, ApJ, 603, 7 · DOI
  36. Kroupa P., Theis C., Boily C. M., 2005, A&A, 431, 517 · DOI
  37. Kunkel W. E., Demers S., 1976, in Dickens R. J., Perry J. E., Smith F. G., King I. R., eds, Royal Greenwich Observatory Bulletins Vol. 182, The Galaxy and the Local Group, Royal Greenwich Observatory, Greenwich. p. 241
  38. Libeskind N. I., Frenk C. S., Cole S., Helly J. C., Jenkins A., Navarro J. F., Power C., 2005, MNRAS, 363, 146 · DOI
  39. Libeskind N. I., Cole S., Frenk C. S., Okamoto T., Jenkins A., 2007, MNRAS, 374, 16 · DOI
  40. Libeskind N. I., Frenk C. S., Cole S., Jenkins A., Helly J. C., 2009, MNRAS, 399, 550 · DOI
  41. Libeskind N. I., Knebe A., Hoffman Y., Gottlöber S., 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1274 · DOI
  42. Li Y.-S., Helmi A., 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1365 · DOI
  43. Lipnicky A., Chakrabarti S., 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1671 · DOI
  44. Lovell M. R., Eke V. R., Frenk C. S., Jenkins A., 2011, MNRAS, 413, 3013 · DOI
  45. Lynden-Bell D., 1976, MNRAS, 174, 695 · DOI
  46. Lynden-Bell D., 1982, Observatory, 102, 202 · DOI
  47. McAlpine S. et al., 2016, Astron. Comput., 15, 72 · DOI
  48. McConnachie A. W., 2012, AJ, 144, 4 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Metz M., Kroupa P., Libeskind N. I., 2008, ApJ, 680, 287 · DOI
  50. Metz M., Kroupa P., Theis C., Hensler G., Jerjen H., 2009, ApJ, 697, 269 · DOI
  51. Müller O., Pawlowski M. S., Jerjen H., Lelli F., 2018, Science, 359, 534 · DOI
  52. Newton O., Cautun M., Jenkins A., Frenk C. S., Helly J. C., 2018, MNRAS, 479, 2853 · DOI
  53. Nierenberg A. M., Auger M. W., Treu T., Marshall P. J., Fassnacht C. D., Busha M. T., 2012, ApJ, 752, 99 · DOI
  54. Patel E., Besla G., Sohn S. T., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3825 · DOI
  55. Pawlowski M. S., 2016, MNRAS, 456, 448 · DOI
  56. Pawlowski M. S., Kroupa P., 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2116 · DOI
  57. Pawlowski M. S., Kroupa P., Angus G., de Boer K. S., Famaey B., Hensler G., 2012, MNRAS, 424, 80 · DOI
  58. Pawlowski M. S. et al., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2362 · DOI
  59. Pawlowski M. S. et al., 2017, Astron. Nachr., 338, 854 · DOI
  60. Peñarrubia J., Gómez F. A., Besla G., Erkal D., Ma Y.-Z., 2016, MNRAS, 456, L54 · DOI
  61. Piatek S., Pryor C., Olszewski E. W., 2016, AJ, 152, 166 · DOI
  62. Planck Collaboration XVI, 2014, A&A, 571, A16 · DOI
  63. Pontzen A., Read J. I., Teyssier R., Governato F., Gualandris A., Roth N., Devriendt J., 2015, MNRAS, 451, 1366 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Shaya E. J., Tully R. B., 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2096 · DOI
  65. Shi J., Wang H., Mo H. J., 2015, ApJ, 807, 37 · DOI
  66. Smith R., Duc P. A., Bournaud F., Yi S. K., 2016, ApJ, 818, 11 · DOI
  67. Sohn S. T., Besla G., van der Marel R. P., Boylan-Kolchin M., Majewski S. R., Bullock J. S., 2013, ApJ, 768, 139 · DOI
  68. Springel V., Yoshida N., White S. D. M., 2001, New Astron., 6, 79 · DOI
  69. Tully R. B., Libeskind N. I., Karachentsev I. D., Karachentseva V. E., Rizzi L., Shaya E. J., 2015, ApJ, 802, L25 · DOI
  70. Wang J., Frenk C. S., Cooper A. P., 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1502 · DOI
  71. Wang Y. O., Lin W. P., Kang X., Dutton A., Yu Y., Macciò A. V., 2014, ApJ, 786, 8 · DOI
  72. Yang X., van den Bosch F. C., Mo H. J., Mao S., Kang X., Weinmann S. M., Guo Y., Jing Y. P., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1293 · DOI
  73. Zentner A. R., Kravtsov A. V., Gnedin O. Y., Klypin A. A., 2005, ApJ, 629, · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, S., Cautun, M., & Frenk, C. S.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Shao, Shi
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2019-06-26
Volume
488
Issue
1
Pages
1166-1179
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2933573518
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/I00162X/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/R000832/1)
  • European Research Council (GA 786910, ERC-StG-716532-PUNCA)
  • Durham University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
halo flattening, infall time, EAGLE simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review