Evolution of galactic planes of satellites in the eagle simulation
Open accessAbstract
We study the formation of planes of dwarf galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass haloes in the eagle galaxy formation simulation. We focus on satellite systems similar to the one in the MW: spatially thin or with a large fraction of members orbiting in the same plane. To characterize the latter, we introduce a robust method to identify the subsets of satellites that have the most coplanar orbits. Out of the 11 MW classical dwarf satellites, 8 have highly clustered orbital planes whose poles are contained within a 22° opening angle centred around (l, b) = (182°, −2°). This configuration stands out when compared to both isotropic and typical ΛCDM satellite distributions. Purely flattened satellite systems are short-lived chance associations and persist for less than $1\, \rm {Gyr}$. In contrast, satellite subsets that share roughly the same orbital plane are longer lived, with half of the MW-like systems being at least $4\, \rm {Gyr}$ old. On average, satellite systems were flatter in the past, with a minimum in their minor-to-major axes ratio about $9\, \rm {Gyr}$ ago, which is the typical infall time of the classical satellites. MW-like satellite distributions have on average always been flatter than the overall population of satellites in MW-mass haloes and, in particular, they correspond to systems with a high degree of anisotropic accretion of satellites. We also show that torques induced by the aspherical mass distribution of the host halo channel some satellite orbits into the host’s equatorial plane, enhancing the fraction of satellites with coplanar orbits. In fact, the orbital poles of coplanar satellites are tightly aligned with the minor axis of the host halo.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At larger distances, the flattening of the DM halo becomes important and can affect the dynamics of halo tracers.
“At larger distances, the flattening of the DM halo becomes important and can affect the dynamics of halo tracers”
From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Shao et al. 2019b
Section 4.3.1 (page not supplied) says the host halo’s triaxial shape produces torques that affect satellite orbits, supporting the claim about halo shape and tracer dynamics. It does not establish that this effect becomes important specifically at larger distances. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Fritz, T. K., Battaglia, G., Pawlowski, M. S., Kallivayalil, N., van der Marel, R., Sohn, S. T., Brook, C., & Besla, G. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833343 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
The mass of the Milky Way from satellite dynamics
Callingham, T. M., Cautun, M., Deason, A. J., Frenk, C. S., Wang, W., Gómez, F. A., Grand, R. J. J., Marinacci, F., & Pakmor, R. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz365 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationAlignments between galaxies, satellite systems and haloes
Shao, S., Cautun, M., Frenk, C. S., Gao, L., Crain, R. A., Schaller, M., Schaye, J., & Theuns, T. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1247 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- R E F E R E N C E S Agustsson I., Brainerd T. G., 2010, ApJ, 709, 1321 · DOI
- Ahmed S. H., Brooks A. M., Christensen C. R., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 3119 · DOI
- Arnold V. I., Shandarin S. F., Zeldovich I. B., 1982, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 20, 111 · DOI
- Aubert D., Pichon C., Colombi S., 2004, MNRAS, 352, 376 · DOI
- Bahl H., Baumgardt H., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 2916 · DOI
- Banik I., O'Ryan D., Zhao H., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 4768 · DOI
- Besla G., Kallivayalil N., Hernquist L., Robertson B., Cox T. J., van der Marel R. P., Alcock C., 2007, ApJ, 668, 949 · DOI
- Bowden A., Evans N. W., Belokurov V., 2013, MNRAS, 435, 928 · DOI · Paper page
- Brainerd T. G., 2005, ApJ, 628, L101 · DOI
- Buck T., Macciò A. V., Dutton A. A., 2015, ApJ, 809, 49 · DOI
- Buck T., Dutton A. A., Macciò A. V., 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4348 · DOI
- Cautun M., Frenk C. S., 2017, MNRAS, 468, L41 · DOI
- Cautun M., van de Weygaert R., Jones B. J. T., Frenk C. S., 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2923 · DOI
- Cautun M., Deason A. J., Frenk C. S., McAlpine S., 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2185 · DOI
- Conn A. R. et al., 2013, ApJ, 766, 120 · DOI
- Crain R. A. et al., 2015, MNRAS, 450, 1937 · DOI · Paper page
- Danovich M., Dekel A., Hahn O., Teyssier R., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1732 · DOI
- Davis M., Efstathiou G., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1985, ApJ, 292, 371 · DOI
- Deason A. J. et al., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2607 · DOI
- Dolag K., Borgani S., Murante G., Springel V., 2009, MNRAS, 399, 497 · DOI
- Erkal D., Sanders J. L., Belokurov V., 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1590 · DOI
- Erkal D. et al., 2018, MNRAS, 481, 3148 · DOI
- Fernando N., Arias V., Guglielmo M., Lewis G. F., Ibata R. A., Power C., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 641 · DOI
- Fernando N., Arias V., Lewis G. F., Ibata R. A., Power C., 2018, MNRAS, 473, 2212 · DOI
- Gaia Collaboration, 2018, A&A, 616, A12 · DOI
- Gillet N., Ocvirk P., Aubert D., Knebe A., Libeskind N., Yepes G., Gottlöber S., Hoffman Y., 2015, ApJ, 800, 34 · DOI
- Gómez F. A., Besla G., Carpintero D. D., Villalobos Á., O'Shea B. W., Bell E. F., 2015, ApJ, 802, 128 · DOI
- González R. E., Padilla N. D., 2016, ApJ, 829, 58 · DOI
- Hammer F., Yang Y., Fouquet S., Pawlowski M. S., Kroupa P., Puech M., Flores H., Wang J., 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3543 · DOI
- Hodkinson B., Scholtz J., 2019, preprint (arXiv:1904.03192) · arXiv
- Ibata R. A. et al., 2013, Nature, 493, 62 · DOI
- Jiang L., Helly J. C., Cole S., Frenk C. S., 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2115 · DOI
- Kallivayalil N., van der Marel R. P., Besla G., Anderson J., Alcock C., 2013, ApJ, 764, 161 · DOI
- Kang X., Mao S., Gao L., Jing Y. P., 2005, A&A, 437, 383 · DOI
- Knebe A., Gill S. P. D., Gibson B. K., Lewis G. F., Ibata R. A., Dopita M. A., 2004, ApJ, 603, 7 · DOI
- Kroupa P., Theis C., Boily C. M., 2005, A&A, 431, 517 · DOI
- Kunkel W. E., Demers S., 1976, in Dickens R. J., Perry J. E., Smith F. G., King I. R., eds, Royal Greenwich Observatory Bulletins Vol. 182, The Galaxy and the Local Group, Royal Greenwich Observatory, Greenwich. p. 241
- Libeskind N. I., Frenk C. S., Cole S., Helly J. C., Jenkins A., Navarro J. F., Power C., 2005, MNRAS, 363, 146 · DOI
- Libeskind N. I., Cole S., Frenk C. S., Okamoto T., Jenkins A., 2007, MNRAS, 374, 16 · DOI
- Libeskind N. I., Frenk C. S., Cole S., Jenkins A., Helly J. C., 2009, MNRAS, 399, 550 · DOI
- Libeskind N. I., Knebe A., Hoffman Y., Gottlöber S., 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1274 · DOI
- Li Y.-S., Helmi A., 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1365 · DOI
- Lipnicky A., Chakrabarti S., 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1671 · DOI
- Lovell M. R., Eke V. R., Frenk C. S., Jenkins A., 2011, MNRAS, 413, 3013 · DOI
- Lynden-Bell D., 1976, MNRAS, 174, 695 · DOI
- Lynden-Bell D., 1982, Observatory, 102, 202 · DOI
- McAlpine S. et al., 2016, Astron. Comput., 15, 72 · DOI
- McConnachie A. W., 2012, AJ, 144, 4 · DOI · Paper page
- Metz M., Kroupa P., Libeskind N. I., 2008, ApJ, 680, 287 · DOI
- Metz M., Kroupa P., Theis C., Hensler G., Jerjen H., 2009, ApJ, 697, 269 · DOI
- Müller O., Pawlowski M. S., Jerjen H., Lelli F., 2018, Science, 359, 534 · DOI
- Newton O., Cautun M., Jenkins A., Frenk C. S., Helly J. C., 2018, MNRAS, 479, 2853 · DOI
- Nierenberg A. M., Auger M. W., Treu T., Marshall P. J., Fassnacht C. D., Busha M. T., 2012, ApJ, 752, 99 · DOI
- Patel E., Besla G., Sohn S. T., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3825 · DOI
- Pawlowski M. S., 2016, MNRAS, 456, 448 · DOI
- Pawlowski M. S., Kroupa P., 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2116 · DOI
- Pawlowski M. S., Kroupa P., Angus G., de Boer K. S., Famaey B., Hensler G., 2012, MNRAS, 424, 80 · DOI
- Pawlowski M. S. et al., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2362 · DOI
- Pawlowski M. S. et al., 2017, Astron. Nachr., 338, 854 · DOI
- Peñarrubia J., Gómez F. A., Besla G., Erkal D., Ma Y.-Z., 2016, MNRAS, 456, L54 · DOI
- Piatek S., Pryor C., Olszewski E. W., 2016, AJ, 152, 166 · DOI
- Planck Collaboration XVI, 2014, A&A, 571, A16 · DOI
- Pontzen A., Read J. I., Teyssier R., Governato F., Gualandris A., Roth N., Devriendt J., 2015, MNRAS, 451, 1366 · DOI · Paper page
- Shaya E. J., Tully R. B., 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2096 · DOI
- Shi J., Wang H., Mo H. J., 2015, ApJ, 807, 37 · DOI
- Smith R., Duc P. A., Bournaud F., Yi S. K., 2016, ApJ, 818, 11 · DOI
- Sohn S. T., Besla G., van der Marel R. P., Boylan-Kolchin M., Majewski S. R., Bullock J. S., 2013, ApJ, 768, 139 · DOI
- Springel V., Yoshida N., White S. D. M., 2001, New Astron., 6, 79 · DOI
- Tully R. B., Libeskind N. I., Karachentsev I. D., Karachentseva V. E., Rizzi L., Shaya E. J., 2015, ApJ, 802, L25 · DOI
- Wang J., Frenk C. S., Cooper A. P., 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1502 · DOI
- Wang Y. O., Lin W. P., Kang X., Dutton A., Yu Y., Macciò A. V., 2014, ApJ, 786, 8 · DOI
- Yang X., van den Bosch F. C., Mo H. J., Mao S., Kang X., Weinmann S. M., Guo Y., Jing Y. P., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1293 · DOI
- Zentner A. R., Kravtsov A. V., Gnedin O. Y., Klypin A. A., 2005, ApJ, 629, · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2
Cautun, M., Benítez-Llambay, A., Deason, A. J., Frenk, C. S., Fattahi, A., Gómez, F. A., Grand, R. J. J., Oman, K. A., Navarro, J. F., & Simpson, C. M. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1017 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Milky Way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2
Cautun, M., Benitez-Llambay, A., Deason, A. J., Frenk, C. S., Fattahi, A., Gómez, F. A., Grand, R. J. J., Oman, K. A., Navarro, J. F., & Simpson, C. M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.04557 · Cited by 335
Self-citation
- Authors
- Shao, S., Cautun, M., & Frenk, C. S.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Shao, Shi
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-06-26
- Volume
- 488
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1166-1179
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2933573518
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/I00162X/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/R000832/1)
- European Research Council (GA 786910, ERC-StG-716532-PUNCA)
- Durham University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- halo flattening, infall time, EAGLE simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review