Cited by 85Smoking Behavior and CessationBehavioral Health and InterventionsGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Smokers' responses toward cigarette pack warning labels in predicting quit intention, stage of change, and self-efficacy

Open access
Fathelrahman, Ahmed I., Omar, Maizurah, Awang, Rahmat, Borland, Ron, Fong, Geoffrey T., Hammond, David, Zain, Zarihah·2009·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This paper is concerned with the effects of cigarette pack warning labels on quitting intentions. We examined whether different responses among smokers toward cigarette pack warning labels could predict quit intentions and self-efficacy in quitting. Variables studied were "noticing warning labels during last month," "reading or looking closely at warning labels," "avoiding looking at labels during last month," "thinking about health risks of smoking because of the warning labels, "more likely to quit because of the warning labels," and "stopping from having a cigarette when about to smoke one because of the labels." METHODS: A total of 2,006 adult smokers in Malaysia were surveyed in face-to-face interviews using a standardized questionnaire. Of those, 1,919 male smokers were included in the analyses. RESULTS: The responses "more likely to quit because of the warning labels" and "stopped from having a cigarette when about to smoke one" significantly predicted all stages of change and self-efficacy, independent of the other measures. In addition, thinking about the health risks and reading the warnings more often added extra predictive capacity but only in the early stages of contemplating change. DISCUSSION: Less intense processing of the information may be important in initiating thoughts, but cognitions about quitting and foregoing cigarettes are the key mechanisms by which warnings stimulate quitting intentions and help smokers feel capable of succeeding. Malaysian smokers appear to respond to warnings in ways comparable with those from developed countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntn029

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Clearinghouse for Tobacco Control. Tobacco control in Malaysia: A long winding road. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia: National Poison Centre; 2005. (Internal document) [Google Scholar]
  2. Fathelrahman AI, Maizurah O, Rahmat A, Razak L, Foong K, Haslina H. Noticing Malaysian warning labels is associated with increased knowledge and history of quitting attempts. 2006 Malaysian Conference on Tobacco Control 2006, Melia Kuala Lumpur, the Malaysian Council for Tobacco Control, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mackay J, Eriksen M, Shafey O. The Tobacco Atlas. 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2006. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fathelrahman, A. I., Omar, M., Awang, R., Borland, R., Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., & Zain, Z.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • Ministry of Health (MY)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2009-02-26
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
248-253
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2112180134
Cited by
85
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Waterloo
  • Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Cancer Council Victoria
  • National Cancer Institute (1P50 CA11236-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
smoking cessation, smoking cessation intentions, self-efficacy, stages of change, health risk perception, tobacco control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Consumer Product Safety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Product Labeling, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Self Efficacy, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review