Cited by 56Smoking Behavior and CessationBehavioral Health and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Behavior change techniques used in group-based behavioral support by the English stop-smoking services and preliminary assessment of association with short-term quit outcomes

West, Robert, Evans, Adam, Michie, Susan·2011·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable coding scheme for components of group-based behavioral support for smoking cessation, to establish the frequency of inclusion in English Stop-Smoking Service (SSS) treatment manuals of specific components, and to investigate the associations between inclusion of behavior change techniques (BCTs) and service success rates. METHODS: A taxonomy of BCTs specific to group-based behavioral support was developed and reliability of use assessed. All English SSSs (n = 145) were contacted to request their group-support treatment manuals. BCTs included in the manuals were identified using this taxonomy. Associations between inclusion of specific BCTs and short-term (4-week) self-reported quit outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Fourteen group-support BCTs were identified with >90% agreement between coders. One hundred and seven services responded to the request for group-support manuals of which 30 had suitable documents. On average, 7 BCTs were included in each manual. Two were positively associated with 4-week quit rates: "communicate group member identities" and a "betting game" (a financial deposit that is lost if a stop-smoking "buddy" relapses). CONCLUSION: It is possible to reliably code group-specific BCTs for smoking cessation. Fourteen such techniques are present in guideline documents of which 2 appear to be associated with higher short-term self-reported quit rates when included in treatment manuals of English SSSs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntr120

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
West, R., Evans, A., & Michie, S.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2011-07
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
1316-1320
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2001877879
Cited by
56
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
behaviour change techniques, smoking cessation, smoking cessation services, treatment manual, quit rates, relapse prevention, financial incentives
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Behavior Therapy, United Kingdom, Humans, Manuals as Topic, Patient Compliance, Preventive Health Services, Time Factors, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review