The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility
Abstract
The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility is a review of the academic research that has both prompted, and responded to, the issues of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Business schools, the media, the corporate sector, governments, and non-governmental organizations have all begun to pay more attention to these issues in recent years. These issues encompass broad questions about the changing relationship between business, society and government, environmental issues, corporate governance, the social and ethical dimensions of management, globalization, stakeholder debates, shareholder and consumer activism, changing political systems and values, and the ways in which corporations can respond to new social imperatives. The book, which provides clear thinking and new perspectives on CSR and the debates around it, is divided into seven key sections: introduction; perspectives on CSR; critiques of CSR; actors and drivers; managing CSR; CSR in a global context; future perspectives and conclusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x · Cited by 2,131
Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y · Cited by 796
Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability
Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003 · Cited by 630
Wijen, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0218 · Cited by 459
Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Guerci, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1 · Cited by 444
Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges
Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12196 · Cited by 418
Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory
Crilly, D. (2011) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.57 · Cited by 331
The Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Network Societies: A Communication View
Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8 · Cited by 300
Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2837 · Cited by 291
Vasi, I. B., & King, B. G. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412448796 · Cited by 286
Archel, P., Husillos, J., & Spence, C. (2011) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.06.003 · Cited by 285
Schoeneborn, D., Morsing, M., & Crane, A. (2020) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650319845091 · Cited by 230
The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9734-1 · Cited by 141
Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences
Halme, M., Roome, N., & Dobers, P. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.12.001 · Cited by 123
Lee, M.-D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2011) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650310394640 · Cited by 113
From Taken‐for‐Granted to Explicit Commitment: The Rise of CSR in a Corporatist Country
Höllerer, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12029 · Cited by 97
Crifo, P., Durand, R., & Gond, J.-P. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026619848145 · Cited by 62
Discursive Closure and Discursive Openings in Sustainability
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2015) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318914563574 · Cited by 54
Ola, O., & Benjamin, E. (2019) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f10060479 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-02-14
- OpenAlex
- W1586535313
- Cited by
- 2,107
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 140.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
