Cited by 67Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Pathological changes in frontal cortex from biopsy to autopsy in Alzheimer's disease

Bennett, David A., Cochran, Elizabeth J., Saper, Clifford B., Leverenz, James B., Gilley, David W., Wilson, Robert S.·1993·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

We evaluated the change in density of total senile plaques, plaque subtypes, and neurofibrillary tangles, from biopsy to autopsy in left frontal cortical sections from four patients with clinically typical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Comparisons were made on sections stained with modified Bielschowsky and Thioflavin S. In two cases, comparisons were also made on tissue stained with a monoclonal Alz-50 antibody and an antiserum to A beta (beta-amyloid protein). Despite a marked decline in mental status over several years of follow-up clinical evaluations, there was no consistent significant change in numerical density of plaques or tangles among the four cases. However, we did find fewer primitive plaques in the autopsy specimens. These results from longitudinally evaluated persons with typical AD suggest that although plaques and tangles may serve as adequate markers of the presence of AD, their numerical density within a single neocortical region may not reflect dementia severity. This conclusion supports the results of recent cross-sectional studies on the progression of pathology among persons with AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(93)90043-b

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, D. A., Cochran, E. J., Saper, C. B., Leverenz, J. B., Gilley, D. W., & Wilson, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Bennett, David A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-11
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
589-596
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083758861
Cited by
67
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 10161, AG09466, P30AG010161, P01AG009466)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, frontal cortex, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, plaque density, dementia severity, longitudinal follow-up, amyloid-beta, thioflavin S staining, disease progression
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigens, Bethanechol Compounds, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Humans, Injections, Intraventricular, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review