Cited by 21Coffee research and impactsAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

COFFEE DRINKING AND MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN YOUNG WOMEN: AN UPDATE

ROSENBERG, LYNN, WERLER, MARTHA M., KAUFMAN, DAVID W., SHAPIRO, SAMUEL·1987·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

LYNN ROSENBERG, MARTHA M. WERLER, DAVID W. KAUFMAN, SAMUEL SHAPIRO; COFFEE DRINKING AND MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN YOUNG WOMEN: AN UPDATE, American Journal of Epi

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114648

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROSENBERG, L., WERLER, M. M., KAUFMAN, D. W., & SHAPIRO, S.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
ROSENBERG, LYNN
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1987-07
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
147-149
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1836186241
Cited by
21
References
0
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
coffee consumption, myocardial infarction, young women, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Caffeine, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review