Cited by 41Coffee research and impactsAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsNutritional Studies and Diet

Coffee consumption and cause-specific mortality association with age at death and compression of mortality

Lindsted, Kristian D., Kuzma, Jan W., Anderson, James L.·1992·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

The relationship between reported coffee consumption and specific causes of death was examined in 9484 males enrolled in the Adventist Mortality Study in 1960 and followed through 1985. Coffee consumption was divided into three levels: less than 1 cup per day, 1-2 cups per day, and greater than or equal to 3 cups per day. Approximately one third of the subjects did not drink coffee. Cause-specific mortality rates were compared using survival analysis including Cox's proportional hazard model, and controlling for potential confounders such as body mass index, heart disease and hypertension at baseline, race, physical activity, marital status, educational level, smoking history, and dietary pattern. Inclusion of interaction terms between coffee consumption and attained age as time-dependent covariates allowed the hazard ratio to vary with age. Univariate analyses showed a statistically significant association (p less than 0.05) for coffee consumption and mortality for most endpoints. Multivariate analyses showed a small but statistically significant association between coffee consumption and mortality from ischemic heart disease, other cardiovascular diseases, all cardiovascular diseases, and all causes of death. For the major causes of death, the hazard ratios decreased from about 2.5 at 30 years of age to 1.0 around 95 years of age. These results indicate that abstinence from coffee leads to compression of mortality rather than an increase in lifespan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90051-n

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindsted, K. D., Kuzma, J. W., & Anderson, J. L.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
733-742
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143738545
Cited by
41
References
65
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca014703-17)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-14703, CA-35888)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
coffee consumption, cause-specific mortality, compression of mortality, age at death, cardiovascular mortality, ischemic heart disease, men, lifespan
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, California, Cause of Death, Coffee, Demography, Humans, Life Style, Longevity, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review