Cited by 65Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Stereometric evaluation of peritoneal endometriosis and endometriotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum

Donnez, J., Nisolle, M., Casanas-Roux, F., Brion, P., DaFerreira, N.C.·1996·Human Reproduction

Abstract

A computerized morphometrical investigation was performed on endometriotic tissue from the peritoneum (n = 225) and rectovaginal nodules (n = 65) to compare histologically and stereologically the rectovaginal septum endometriotic nodule to peritoneal endometriosis. Mitotic activity, stromal vascularization and the epithelium/stroma ratio were found to be significantly different in peritoneal and rectovaginal endometriosis. The evaluation revealed a major role of glandular epithelium in rectovaginal nodules where the stroma sometimes appeared absent around glandular epithelium. The study demonstrated opposite effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and lynestrenol on the two lesions. Indeed, in peritoneal endometriosis, after GnRHa therapy, our study demonstrated a lower rate of mitosis and poor stromal vascularization. The same drug was unable to induce the same effects in the nodule although, in contrast, lynestrenol has a strong effect on nodule vascularization. In conclusion, it is suggested that the rectovaginal adenomyotic nodule is a specific disease, different from peritoneal endometriosis. It is not the consequence of 'deep infiltrating' endometriosis but can probably develop from Mullerian rests present in the rectovaginal septum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019024

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnez, J., Nisolle, M., Casanas-Roux, F., Brion, P., & DaFerreira, N. C.
Affiliations
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
Corresponding author
Donnez, J.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
224-228
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2154320004
Cited by
65
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
peritoneal endometriosis, rectovaginal septum, stereology, mitotic activity, glandular epithelium, GnRH agonist, lynestrenol, deep infiltrating endometriosis, Müllerian remnants
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Epithelium, Female, Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Lynestrenol, Mitosis, Peritoneum, Vagina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review