Cited by 106Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Biology and Fertility

Endometriosis, recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: is there an immunological link?

Tomassetti, C, Meuleman, C, Pexsters, A, Mihalyi, A, Kyama, C, Simsa, P, D'Hooghe, TM·2006·Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Abstract

Endometriosis is more frequently diagnosed in patients with infertility than in a normal population. The goal of this paper is to give an overview of the clinical and fundamental evidence for a possible link between endometriosis and (recurrent) miscarriage or implantation failure after treatment with assisted reproductive technology. According to the literature, there is insufficient evidence for an association between endometriosis and (recurrent) miscarriage, but there is, however, epidemiological evidence to support the link between endometriosis and recurrent implantation failure after assisted reproduction. This can possibly be explained by alterations in humoral and cell-mediated immunity in women with endometriosis. Humoral immunological changes include increased formation of antibodies against endometrial antigens, anti-laminin-1 auto-antibodies and other auto-immune antibodies (e.g. antiphospholipid). Cell-mediated immunological changes include alterations in peritoneal and follicular fluid immune cells and cytokines. The possible negative effect of these immunological changes on folliculogenesis, ovulation, oocyte quality, early embryonic development and implantation in women with endometriosis suggests that infertility in endometriosis patients may be related to alterations within the follicle or oocyte, resulting in embryos with decreased ability to implant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62016-0

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomassetti, C., Meuleman, C., Pexsters, A., Mihalyi, A., Kyama, C., Simsa, P., & D'Hooghe, T.
Affiliations
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
58-64
ISSN
1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085072288
Cited by
106
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
endometriosis, recurrent pregnancy loss, implantation failure, assisted reproduction, autoantibodies, antiphospholipid antibodies, cell-mediated immunity, humoral immunity, follicular fluid, peritoneal fluid, cytokines, oocyte quality, folliculogenesis, ovulation, infertility
MeSH terms
Abortion, Habitual, Autoantibodies, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Infertility, Female, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Gene Expression, Cytokines, Treatment Failure, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Embryonic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review