Cited by 21Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Cognitive Functions and Memory

A Framework for Understanding the Contribution of Psychosocial Factors in Biopsychosocial Explanatory Models of Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms

Faulkner, Josh W, Snell, Deborah L·2023·Physical Therapy

Abstract

Biopsychosocial models are currently used to explain the development of persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) following concussion. These models support a holistic multidisciplinary management of postconcussion symptoms. One catalyst for the development of these models is the consistently strong evidence pertaining to the role of psychological factors in the development of PPCS. However, when applying biopsychosocial models in clinical practice, understanding and addressing the influence of psychological factors in PPCS can be challenging for clinicians. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to support clinicians in this process. In this Perspective article, we discuss current understandings of the main psychological factors involved in PPCS in adults and summarize these into 5 interrelated tenets: preinjury psychosocial vulnerabilities, psychological distress following concussion, environment and contextual factors, transdiagnostic processes, and the role of learning principles. With these tenets in mind, an explanation of how PPCS develop in one person but not in another is proposed. The application of these tenets in clinical practice is then outlined. Guidance is provided on how these tenets can be used to identify psychosocial risk factors, derive predictions, and mitigate the development of PPCS after concussion from a psychological perspective within biopsychosocial conceptualizations. IMPACT: This Perspective helps clinicians apply biopsychosocial explanatory models to the clinical management of concussion, providing summary tenets that can guide hypothesis testing, assessment, and treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ptj/pzac156

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faulkner, J. W., & Snell, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Faulkner, Josh W
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2022-11-09
Volume
103
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W4308715499
Cited by
21
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand Foxley Clinical Fellowship (20/041)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
concussion, biopsychosocial model, psychosocial factors, psychological distress, contextual factors, transdiagnostic mechanisms, learning principles, psychosocial risk factors
MeSH terms
Models, Biopsychosocial, Adult, Brain Concussion, Humans, Risk Factors, Post-Concussion Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review