Cited by 84Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

An fMRI study of the brain responses of traumatized mothers to viewing their toddlers during separation and play

Open access
Schechter, Daniel S., Moser, Dominik A., Wang, Zhishun, Marsh, Rachel, Hao, XueJun, Duan, Yunsuo, Yu, Shan, Gunter, Benjamin +7 more·2012·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

This study tested whether mothers with interpersonal violence-related posttraumatic stress disorder (IPV-PTSD) vs healthy controls (HC) would show greater limbic and less frontocortical activity when viewing young children during separation compared to quiet play. Mothers of 20 children (12-42 months) participated: 11 IPV-PTSD mothers and 9 HC with no PTSD. During fMRI, mothers watched epochs of play and separation from their own and unfamiliar children. The study focused on comparison of PTSD mothers vs HC viewing children in separation vs play, and viewing own vs unfamiliar children in separation. Both groups showed distinct patterns of brain activation in response to viewing children in separation vs play. PTSD mothers showed greater limbic and less frontocortical activity (BA10) than HC. PTSD mothers also reported feeling more stressed than HC when watching own and unfamiliar children during separation. Their self-reported stress was associated with greater limbic and less frontocortical activity. Both groups also showed distinct patterns of brain activation in response to viewing their own vs unfamiliar children during separation. PTSD mothers' may not have access to frontocortical regulation of limbic response upon seeing own and unfamiliar children in separation. This converges with previously reported associations of maternal IPV-PTSD and atypical caregiving behavior following separation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsr069

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTSD symptoms were inversely correlated with superior frontal gyrus activity and positively associated with caudate activity.

    “PTSD symptoms were inversely correlated with superior frontal gyrus activity and positively associated with caudate activity.”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Schechter et al., 2012

  • The described circuitry in women with IPV-PTSD compared to healthy mothers included heightened activity in bilateral anterior entorhinal cortex, left caudate, left insula, and reduced frontocortical activity in superior frontal gyrus and bilateral superior parietal lobes.

    “The circuitry described included heightened activity in emotion regulation and empathy regions -- bilateral anterior entorhinal cortex, left caudate, left insula, and reduced frontocortical activity (superior frontal gyrus and bilateral superior parietal lobes) in women with IPV-PTSD compared to healthy mothers.”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Schechter et al., 2012

  • 12-48 months postpartum mothers with PTSD secondary to adult interpersonal violence-related PTSD had heightened subcortical responses in the fear circuitry.

    “Similar to non-postpartum populations, but in contrast to anxious and depressed postpartum mothers,12–48 months postpartum mothers with PTSD secondary to adult interpersonal violence-related PTSD (IPV-PTSD) had heightened subcortical responses in the fear circuitry (Schechter et al., 2012).”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Schechter et al., 2012

  • In mothers viewing child separation versus free play videos, IPV-PTSD mothers activated an unrestrained fear-circuitry that was associated with higher subjective ratings of stress.

    “In this study of mothers viewing child separation vs. free play videos, IPV-PTSD mothers activated an “unrestrained” fear-circuitry that was associated with higher subjective ratings of stress.”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Schechter et al., 2012

  • IPV-PTSD mothers vs healthy mothers reported greater stress to viewing separation vignettes; greater limbic and reduced fronto-cortical activity was observed in IPV-PTSD mothers relative to healthy mothers in separation vs play conditions, with reports of stress linking to neural findings (Schechter et al., 2012).

    “IPV–PTSD mothers vs. healthy mothers (11 vs. 9) reported greater stress to viewing separation vignettes, greater limbic and reduced fronto-cortical activity was observed in IPV–PTSD mothers relative to healthy mothers in separation vs. play conditions, with reports of stress to viewing separation linking to the neural findings.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lyons-Ruth, K., Block, D. (1996). The disturbed caregiving system: relations among childhood trauma, maternal caregiving, and infant affect and at- tachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17, 257-75.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schechter, D. S., Moser, D. A., Wang, Z., Marsh, R., Hao, X., Duan, Y., Yu, S., Gunter, B., Murphy, D., McCaw, J., Kangarlu, A., Willheim, E., Myers, M. M., Hofer, M. A., & Peterson, B. S.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2011-10-22
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
969-979
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2099367655
Cited by
84
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • International Psychoanalytical Association
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Université de Genève
  • Gertrude von Meissner-Stiftung
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH068405)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017820)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
mothers, toddlers, maternal separation, maternal stress, limbic system, caregiver behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Preschool, Divorce, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Play and Playthings, Residence Characteristics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review