Cited by 144Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyIndian and Buddhist Studies

Increased gray matter volume in the right angular and posterior parahippocampal gyri in loving-kindness meditators

Open access
Leung, Mei-Kei, Chan, Chetwyn C. H., Yin, Jing, Lee, Chack-Fan, So, Kwok-Fai, Lee, Tatia M. C.·2013·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies have revealed that meditation is associated with structural brain changes in regions underlying cognitive processes that are required for attention or mindfulness during meditation. This VBM study examined brain changes related to the practice of an emotion-oriented meditation: loving-kindness meditation (LKM). A 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner captured images of the brain structures of 25 men, 10 of whom had practiced LKM in the Theravada tradition for at least 5 years. Compared with novices, more gray matter volume was detected in the right angular and posterior parahippocampal gyri in LKM experts. The right angular gyrus has not been previously reported to have structural differences associated with meditation, and its specific role in mind and cognitive empathy theory suggests the uniqueness of this finding for LKM practice. These regions are important for affective regulation associated with empathic response, anxiety and mood. At the same time, gray matter volume in the left temporal lobe in the LKM experts appeared to be greater, an observation that has also been reported in previous MRI meditation studies on meditation styles other than LKM. Overall, the findings of our study suggest that experience in LKM may influence brain structures associated with affective regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nss076

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practicing Metta is linked to increased resilience and enhanced emotional regulation skills.

    “First evidence has revealed that practicing Metta is linked to increased resilience and enhanced emotional regulation skills [31–33].”

    From Mindfulness and compassion-oriented practices at work reduce distress and enhance self-care of palliative care teams: a mixed-method evaluation of an "on the job" program. (2018) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction describes loving-kindness meditation (Metta) as training emotion regulation, and the Conclusions report greater gray matter volume in regions important for emotion regulation among experienced practitioners. The study does not assess resilience or demonstrate enhanced emotional-regulation skills; those claims go beyond its brain-structure findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long-term LKM practitioners are associated with enlarged right angular and posterior parahippocampal gyri, regions heavily involved in empathy and affective regulation.

    “Leung et al. [41] observed that long-term LKM practitioners are associated with enlarged right angular and posterior parahippocampal gyri, regions heavily involved in empathy and affective regulation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leung, M.-K., Chan, C. C. H., Yin, J., Lee, C.-F., So, K.-F., & Lee, T. M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Lee, Tatia M. C.
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2012-07-18
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
34-39
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2135362000
Cited by
144
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
loving-kindness meditation, gray matter volume, angular gyrus, emotion regulation, cognitive empathy, left temporal lobe, meditation experience
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attention, Awareness, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Practice, Psychological, Radiography, Matched-Pair Analysis, Meditation, Parahippocampal Gyrus, Beneficence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review