Cited by 98Action Observation and SynchronizationNeural dynamics and brain functionEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Beta- and gamma-band activity reflect predictive coding in the processing of causal events

Open access
van Pelt, Stan, Heil, Lieke, Kwisthout, Johan, Ondobaka, Sasha, van Rooij, Iris, Bekkering, Harold·2016·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

In daily life, complex events are perceived in a causal manner, suggesting that the brain relies on predictive processes to model them. Within predictive coding theory, oscillatory beta-band activity has been linked to top-down predictive signals and gamma-band activity to bottom-up prediction errors. However, neurocognitive evidence for predictive coding outside lower-level sensory areas is scarce. We used magnetoencephalography to investigate neural activity during probability-dependent action perception in three areas pivotal for causal inference, superior temporal sulcus, temporoparietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex, using bowling action animations. Within this network, Granger-causal connectivity in the beta-band was found to be strongest for backward top-down connections and gamma for feed-forward bottom-up connections. Moreover, beta-band power in TPJ increased parametrically with the predictability of the action kinematics-outcome sequences. Conversely, gamma-band power in TPJ and MPFC increased with prediction error. These findings suggest that the brain utilizes predictive-coding-like computations for higher-order cognition such as perception of causal events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsw017

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct evidence for alpha/beta and gamma in predictive coding per se comes from observations of increased gamma power to stimuli that are prediction errors.

    “Direct evidence for alpha/beta and gamma in predictive coding per se comes from observations of increased gamma power to stimuli that are prediction errors (22, 24, 25).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Oscillatory dynamics play a role in regulating cortical processing, especially the gamma (40 to 90 Hz) and alpha/beta (10 to 30 Hz) bands.

    “But there is mounting evidence that oscillatory dynamics play a role in regulating cortical processing and thus can also play a role, especially the gamma (40 to 90 Hz) and alpha/beta (10 to 30 Hz) bands (1, 18–25).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Pelt, S., Heil, L., Kwisthout, J., Ondobaka, S., van Rooij, I., & Bekkering, H.
Affiliations
  • Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands and
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2016-02-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
973-980
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2255704194
Cited by
98
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (407‐11‐040, 446-14-002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
predictive coding, causal inference, beta oscillations, gamma oscillations, prediction error, top-down prediction, superior temporal sulcus, temporoparietal junction, medial prefrontal cortex, action perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Beta Rhythm, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Motor Activity, Probability, Thinking, Visual Perception, Magnetoencephalography, Gamma Rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review