Cited by 250Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Adolescent development of the neural circuitry for thinking about intentions

Open access
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne, den Ouden, Hanneke, Choudhury, Suparna, Frith, Chris·2007·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

In this fMRI study, we investigated the development during adolescence of the neural network underlying thinking about intentions. A total of 19 adolescent participants (aged 12.1-18.1 years), and 11 adults (aged 22.4-37.8 years), were scanned using fMRI. A factorial design was employed with between-subjects factor age group and within-subjects factor causality (intentional or physical). In both adults and adolescents, answering questions about intentional causality vs physical causality activated the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC), superior temporal sulcus (STS), temporal poles and precuneus bordering with posterior cingulate cortex. In addition, there was a significant interaction between group and task in the medial PFC. During intentional relative to physical causality, adolescents activated part of the medial PFC more than did adults and adults activated part of the right STS more than did adolescents. These results suggest that the neural strategy for thinking about intentions changes between adolescence and adulthood. Although the same neural network is active, the relative roles of the different areas change, with activity moving from anterior (medial prefrontal) regions to posterior (temporal) regions with age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsm009

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some studies, higher activity in more posterior regions such as the pSTS/TPJ and in the ATC was observed in adults as compared to adolescents.

    “In some studies, higher activity in more posterior regions, such as the pSTS/TPJ (Blakemore et al. 2007), and in the ATC (Burnett et al. 2009), was observed in adults as compared to adolescents.”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Blakemore et al. 2007

  • Adolescents exhibit enhanced reactivity in mPFC during mentalizing, relative to adults.

    “A relatively consistent pattern in this line of inquiry is that adolescents exhibit enhanced reactivity in mPFC during mentalizing, relative to adults (Blakemore, 2008; Blakemore et al., 2007; Blakemore et al., 2010; Burnett et al., 2008; Gunther Moor et al., 2012; Pfeifer et al., 2009; Pfeifer & Blakemore, 2012; van den Bos et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Evans AC Collins DL Mills SR Brown ED Kelly RL Peters TM 1993 Proceedings of the IEEE-Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference San Francisco, CA Klaisner LA 1813 17

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blakemore, S.-J., den Ouden, H., Choudhury, S., & Frith, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK, 2Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK, and 3Brain and Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
Corresponding author
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
130-139
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2169774508
Cited by
250
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
31.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (047963)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
adolescent brain development, physical causality, theory of mind, medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, temporal pole, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Cognition, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Social Perception, Thinking, Prefrontal Cortex, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review