Cited by 78Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

Sensory prediction errors in the continuum of psychosis

Randeniya, R., Oestreich, L.K.L., Garrido, M.I.·2018·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Sensory prediction errors are fundamental brain responses that signal a violation of expectation in either the internal or external sensory environment, and are therefore crucial for survival and adaptive behaviour. Patients with schizophrenia show deficits in these internal and external sensory prediction errors, which can be measured using electroencephalography (EEG) components such as N1 and mismatch negativity (MMN), respectively. New evidence suggests that these deficits in sensory prediction errors are more widely distributed on a continuum of psychosis, whereas psychotic experiences exist to varying degrees throughout the general population. In this paper, we review recent findings in sensory prediction errors in the auditory domain across the continuum of psychosis, and discuss these in light of the predictive coding hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.019

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randeniya, R., Oestreich, L. K. L., & Garrido, M. I.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Garrido, M.I.
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
191
Pages
109-122
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2608181477
Cited by
78
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Queensland (2016000071)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
sensory prediction error
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Sensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review