Cited by 105Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMental Health and Psychiatry

Attention to Irrelevant Cues Is Related to Positive Symptoms in Schizophrenia

Open access
Morris, R., Griffiths, O., Le Pelley, M. E., Weickert, T. W.·2013·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Many modern learning theories assume that the amount of attention to a cue depends on how well that cue predicted important events in the past. Schizophrenia is associated with deficits in attention and recent theories of psychosis have argued that positive symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations are related to a failure of selective attention. However, evidence demonstrating that attention to irrelevant cues is related to positive symptoms in schizophrenia is lacking. We used a novel method of measuring attention to nonpredictive (and thus irrelevant) cues in a causal learning test (Le Pelley ME, McLaren IP. Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2003;56:68-79) to assess whether healthy adults and people with schizophrenia discriminate previously predictive and nonpredictive cues. In a series of experiments with independent samples, we demonstrated: (1) when people with schizophrenia who had severe positive symptoms successfully distinguished between predictive and nonpredictive cues during training, they failed to discriminate between predictive and nonpredictive cues relative to healthy adults during subsequent testing and (2) learning about nonpredictive cues was correlated with more severe positive symptoms scores in schizophrenia. These results suggest that positive symptoms of schizophrenia are related to increased attention to nonpredictive cues during causal learning. This deficit in selective attention results in learning irrelevant causal associations and may be the basis of positive symptoms in schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbr192

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Beesley T Le Pelley ME Griffiths O Overt attention and predictive validity in human associative learning J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2011 37 220 229 21319915
  2. [28]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders—Patient Edition 2007 1st ed, revised. New York, NY Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, R., Griffiths, O., Le Pelley, M. E., & Weickert, T. W.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Morris, R.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2012-01-20
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
575-582
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2126168108
Cited by
105
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation
  • Pratt Foundation
  • Neuroscience Research Australia
  • University of New South Wales
  • NSW Ministry of Health
  • Ramsay Health Care
  • Australian Schizophrenia Research Bank
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (568807)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, positive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Association Learning, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review