Cited by 74Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Randomized Controlled Trial of Variable-Pressure Versus Fixed-Pressure Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Treatment for Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS)

Open access
Vennelle, Marjorie, White, Sandra, Riha, Renata L., Mackay, Tom W., Engleman, Heather M., Douglas, Neil J.·2010·Sleep

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fixed-pressure or variable-pressure CPAP was preferred by patients and gave better outcomes in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). DESIGN: Randomized blinded cross-over trial with 6 weeks of fixed and 6 weeks of variable-pressure CPAP. SETTING: Sleep center. PATIENTS: 200 consecutive consenting CPAP naïve patients with daytime sleepiness and > 15 apneas + hypopneas/h after an attended auto-CPAP titration night. INTERVENTIONS: CPAP therapy using the same device (Autoset Spirit) set for 6 weeks in fixed pressure mode and for 6 weeks in variable pressure mode, the order of therapies being randomized. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: All measurements were recorded at the end of each limb by a researcher blind to treatment. These included symptoms, Epworth Score, CPAP usage, objective sleepiness by modified Osler test, vigilance and health related quality of life. A total of 181 of 200 patients completed the study. At the end of the study, patients expressed no significant difference in the primary outcome, patient preference, 72 patients preferring fixed and 69 preferring variable-pressure CPAP. Epworth score was lower on variable (9.5, SEM 0.4) than fixed-pressure CPAP (10.0, SEM 0.3; P = 0.031). Mean CPAP use was higher on variable (4.2, SEM 0.2 h/night) than fixed-pressure CPAP (4.0, SEM 0.2 h/night; P = 0.047). There were no other significant differences between treatments. CONCLUSIONS This study shows no difference in patient preference and only a marginal benefit of variable over fixed-pressure CPAP in OSAHS in terms of subjective sleepiness and CPAP use. The clinical value of this difference remains to be determined. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: Variable-pressure versus fixed-pressure continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS); Registration # ISRCTN43085025.http://www.controlled-trials.com//SRCTN43085025.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/33.2.267

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. Mulgrew AT, Cheema R, Fleetham J, Ryan CF, Ayas NT. Efficacy and pa- 25. tient satisfaction with auto-adjusting cpap with variable expiratory pres- sure versus standard cpap: a randomized crossover trial. sleep breath 2007;11;1:31-7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vennelle, M., White, S., Riha, R. L., Mackay, T. W., Engleman, H. M., & Douglas, N. J.
Affiliations
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Vennelle, Marjorie
Venue
Sleep
Published
2010-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
267-271
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W268892818
Cited by
74
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, continuous positive airway pressure, patient preferences, daytime sleepiness, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, CPAP adherence, health-related quality of life, sustained attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Air Pressure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Patient Compliance, Utilization Review, Patient Satisfaction, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review