Cited by 114Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Wakefulness Research

Circadian and wake-dependent influences on subjective sleepiness, cognitive throughput, and reaction time performance in older and young adults

Open access
Silva, Edward J., Wang, Wei, Ronda, Joseph M., Wyatt, James K., Duffy, Jeanne F.·2010·Sleep

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess circadian and homeostatic influences on subjective sleepiness and cognitive performance in older adults when sleep and waking are scheduled at different times of day; to assess changes in subjective sleepiness and cognitive performance across several weeks of an inpatient study; and to compare these findings with results from younger adults. DESIGN: Three 24-h baseline days consisting of 16 h of wakefulness and an 8-h sleep opportunity followed by 3-beat cycles of a 20-h forced desynchrony (FD) condition; 18 20-h "days," each consisting of 13.33 h of scheduled wakefulness and 6.67 h of scheduled sleep opportunity. SETTING: Intensive Physiological Monitoring Unit of the Brigham and Women's Hospital General Clinical Research Center. PARTICIPANTS: 10 healthy older adults (age 64.00 +/- 5.98 y, 5 females) and 10 healthy younger adults (age 24.50 +/- 3.54 y, 5 females). INTERVENTIONS: Wake episodes during FD scheduled to begin 4 h earlier each day allowing for data collection at a full range of circadian phases. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Subjective sleepiness, cognitive throughput, and psychomotor vigilance assessed every 2 h throughout the study. Core body temperature (CBT) data collected throughout to assess circadian phase. Older subjects were less sleepy and performed significantly better on reaction time (RT) measures than younger subjects. Decrements among younger subjects increased in magnitude further into the experiment, while the performance of older subjects remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the waking performance and alertness of healthy older subjects are less impacted by the cumulative effects of repeated exposure to adverse circadian phase than that of young adults. This suggests that there are age-related changes in the circadian promotion of alertness, in the wake-dependent decline of alertness, and/or in how these 2 regulatory systems interact in healthy aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/33.4.481

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. University of Minnesota Press; 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [16]Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silva, E. J., Wang, W., Ronda, J. M., Wyatt, J. K., & Duffy, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Silva, Edward J.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2010-04
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
481-490
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W1833552908
Cited by
114
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag012642-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG006072, AG09975, AG12642, AG06072, P01AG009975)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR02635, M01RR002635)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
circadian rhythm, subjective sleepiness, cognitive performance, reaction time, older adults, age differences, forced desynchrony, core body temperature, alertness, sleep homeostasis, psychomotor vigilance, healthy aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Arousal, Body Temperature, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sleep Wake Disorders, Wakefulness, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review