Cited by 259Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic and Environmental Determination of Human Sleep

Partinen, Markku, Kaprio, Jaakko, Koskenvuo, Markku, Putkonen, Pekka, Langinvainio, Heimo·1983·Sleep

Abstract

Self-reported sleep data from 2238 monozygotic and 4545 dizygotic adult twin pairs indicated a significant hereditary effect on sleep length [overall heritability estimate (h2 = 0.44)] and on sleep quality (h2 = 0.44). When the data were examined in subgroups defined by sex, age (18-24 years and 25 or more years of age), and cohabitation status of the twin pair, the highest heritability estimates for sleep length were for twins living together aged 25 or older. For twins living apart the heritability estimates were statistically significant in all women and men aged 25 or older. For sleep quality significant heritability estimates were found for all groups except women living together.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/6.3.179

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic differences account for 30-45% of variance in subjective sleep quality and sleep disturbances and for about 50% in physiological measures of sleep stages.

    “Systematic twin studies using large samples indicate that genetic differences account for 30 -45% of the variance in subjective sleep quality and sleep disturbances (186, 526, 889) and for ϳ50% in physiological measures of sleep stages (137,737,738).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [889]

    The Results (page unavailable) give an overall heritability estimate of 0.44 for self-reported sleep quality, within the claimed 30–45% range. The paper does not report a corresponding estimate for sleep disturbances. The physiological sleep-stage claim has a separate citation group and is not attributed to this source here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Twin studies show sleep duration heritability between 31% and 55%, suggesting substantial genetic influences on sleep need.

    “Twin studies show sleep duration heritability between 31% and 55%, suggesting substantial genetic influences on sleep need.23,48,49”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Friedmann JK, Webb WB. Genetic determinants of the sleep response. Psychophysiology 1970;7:340.
  2. Friedmann JK. A diallel analysis of the genetic underpinnings of mouse sleep. Physiol Behav 1974;12: 169-75.
  3. Valatx JL, Bugat R, Jouvet M. Genetic studies of sleep in mice. Nature 1972;238:226-7.
  4. Roth B, Nevsimalova S, Rechtschaffen A. Hypersomnia with "sleep drunkenness". Arch Gen Psychiat 1972;26:456-62.
  5. Roth B, Bruhova S, Berkova L. Familial sleep paralysis. Arch Suisses Neurol Neurochir Psychiat 1968;102:321-30.
  6. Strohl KP, Saunders NA, Feldman NT, Hallet M. Obstructive sleep apnea in family members. N Engl J Med 1978;299:969-73.
  7. Bakwin H. Sleep walking in twins. Lancet 1970;2:446-7.
  8. Sarna S, Kaprio J, Sistonen P, Koskenvuo M. Diagnosis of twin zygosity by mailed questionnaire. Hum Hered 1978;28:241-54.
  9. Sarna S, Kaprio J. Use of multiple logistic analysis in twin zygosity diagnosis. Hum Hered 1986;30: 71-80.
  10. Falconer DS. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: Ronald Press, 1967.
  11. Kaprio J, Sarna S, Koskenvuo M. Multivariate logit analysis of concordance ratios for qualitative traits in twin studies. Acta Genet Med GemelloI1981;30:267-74.
  12. Imlah NW. Narcolepsy in identical twins. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1961;24:158-60.
  13. Gedda L, Brenci G. Sleep and dream characteristics in twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 1979;28: 23-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Partinen, M., Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M., Putkonen, P., & Langinvainio, H.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Sleep
Published
1983-09
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
179-185
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2402965734
Cited by
257
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
sleep quality, heritability, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, twin pairs, genetic factors, environmental factors, sex differences, age differences, cohabitation status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Environment, Female, Genetics, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Sleep, Time Factors, Twins, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review