CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Burnout and Physical Health among Social Workers: A Three-Year Longitudinal Study

Kim, H., Ji, J., Kao, D.·2011·Social Work
DOI 10.1093/sw/56.3.258
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The high risk of burnout in the social work profession is well established, but little is known about burnout's impact on the physical health of social workers. This article examines the relationship between burnout and physical health, using data from a longitudinal study of social workers. California-registered social workers (N = 406) were surveyed annually over a three-year period. Using structural equation modeling, the authors conducted a path analysis to test whether burnout predicted changes in physical health over time.The results showed that social workers with higher initial levels of burnout later reported more physical health complaints. Moreover, higher levels of burnout led to a faster rate of deterioration in physical health over a one-year period.The potential implications for policy and social service organizations are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sw/56.3.258

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H., Ji, J., & Kao, D.
Venue
Social Work
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
258-268
ISSN
  • 0037-8046
  • 1545-6846
DOI
10.1093/sw/56.3.258
Cited by
229
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review