Cited by 157Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSleep and related disordersTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Neuropsychological Performance and Sleep Disturbance Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Mahmood, Omar, Rapport, Lisa J., Hanks, Robin A., Fichtenberg, Norman L.·2004·Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To examine the relation between sleep disturbance and neurocognitive ability among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design Correlational research evaluating demographic and neuropsychological predictors of sleep disturbance using multiple regression analysis and analysis of variance. Participants Eighty-seven patients with mild to severe TBI admitted to a comprehensive outpatient neurorehabilitation program. Main outcome measures Sleep disturbance assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Results Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that performance on selected measures of cognitive functioning significantly improved prediction of sleep disturbance, accounting for 14% of variance beyond that accounted for by injury severity and gender. The total model accounted for 31% of the variance in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores. Patients with mild TBI reported more sleep disturbance (P Conclusions Sleep disturbance among patients with TBI may be associated with a particular constellation of neuropsychological abilities. These issues are discussed in relation to prior findings that indicate the involvement of additional neuropsychiatric factors associated with sleep disturbance in mild TBI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001199-200409000-00003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with mild TBI still experience sleep disorders and show decreased orexin in the CSF.

    “Patients with mild TBI still experience sleep disorders,59,60 and show decreased orexin in the CSF,56,57”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahmood, O., Rapport, L. J., Hanks, R. A., & Fichtenberg, N. L.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2004-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
378-390
ISSN
0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967225890
Cited by
157
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, sleep disorders, neuropsychological performance, neurocognitive function, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, injury severity, mild traumatic brain injury, neurorehabilitation, sleep quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Injuries, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Sleep Wake Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review