The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human prefrontal lesions increase distractibility to irrelevant sensory inputs
Abstract
Neurological patients with focal lesions in either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, temporal-parietal junction or the posterior hippocampus, and control subjects, were tested on a task requiring short-term retention of environmental sounds. Subjects had to indicate whether initial and subsequent test sounds were identical in two conditions. The initial and test sounds were separated by either a silent period varying from 4 to 12.6 s (no-distractor condition) or a series of irrelevant tones (distractor condition). Prefrontal patients were significantly impaired by distractors at all delays, hippocampal patients were impaired only at longer delays, while temporal-parietal patients performed similar to controls. The findings suggest that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is crucial for gating of distracting information during delay tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 · Cited by 3,889
A neostriatal habit learning system in humans
Knowlton, B. J., Mangels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5280.1399 · Cited by 1,777
Inverted-U–Shaped Dopamine Actions on Human Working Memory and Cognitive Control
Cools, R., & D'Esposito, M. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028 · Cited by 1,673
Rubia, K., Russell, T., Overmeyer, S., Brammer, M. J., Bullmore, E. T., Sharma, T., Simmons, A., Williams, S. C. R., Giampietro, V., Andrew, C. M., et al. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0685 · Cited by 999
Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex
Mansouri, F. A., Tanaka, K., & Buckley, M. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2538 · Cited by 559
Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks
Knight, R. T., Richard Staines, W., Swick, D., & Chao, L. L. (1999) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00004-9 · Cited by 498
Self-citationArnsten, A. F. T. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050084013 · Cited by 458
Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory
Sakai, K., Rowe, J. B., & Passingham, R. E. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn846 · Cited by 390
Anxiety selectively disrupts visuospatial working memory
Shackman, A. J., Sarinopoulos, I., Maxwell, J. S., Pizzagalli, D. A., Lavric, A., & Davidson, R. J. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.40 · Cited by 382
Arnsten, A. F. T., Raskind, M. A., Taylor, F. B., & Connor, D. F. (2015) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.10.002 · Cited by 381
The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex.
D’Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (1999) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00021-4 · Cited by 350
Guse, B., Falkai, P., & Wobrock, T. (2010) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-009-0333-7 · Cited by 340
Chemistry of the mind: Neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cortical function
Robbins, T. W. (2005) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20717 · Cited by 292
Chemistry of the adaptive mind
Cools, R., & Robbins, T. W. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2004.1468 · Cited by 257
Animal models of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Davids, E., Zhang, K., Tarazi, F. I., & Baldessarini, R. J. (2003) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(02)00274-6 · Cited by 250
ADHD and the Prefrontal Cortex
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.01.018 · Cited by 220
Lesions of prefrontal cortex reduce attentional modulation of neuronal responses and synchrony in V4
Gregoriou, G. G., Rossi, A. F., Ungerleider, L. G., & Desimone, R. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3742 · Cited by 177
False memories with age: neural and cognitive underpinnings
Devitt, A. L., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.030 · Cited by 171
Role of the inferior frontal cortex in coping with distracting emotions
Dolcos, F., Kragel, P., Wang, L., & McCarthy, G. (2006) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000236860.24081.be · Cited by 154
Müller, N. G., Machado, L., & Knight, R. T. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290260138582 · Cited by 130
Self-citationHorton, J. E. (2004) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh196 · Cited by 114
Tracking Real-Time Changes in Working Memory Updating and Gating with the Event-Based Eye-Blink Rate
Rac-Lubashevsky, R., Slagter, H. A., & Kessler, Y. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02942-3 · Cited by 52
5.4 Dopaminergic Modulation of Flexible Cognitive Control in Humans
Cools, R., & D’Esposito, M. (2009) · Dopamine Handbook · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373035.003.0017 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, L. L., & Knight, R. T.
- Venue
- NeuroReport
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1605-1610
- ISSN
- 0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045867144
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.