Cited by 292Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Chemistry of the mind: Neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cortical function

Robbins, Trevor W.·2005·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cortical function is reviewed with special reference to the ascending dopaminergic and serotoninergic projections. Evidence is surveyed from studies of rats, nonhuman primates, and humans to suggest that prefrontal dopamine has specific functions in attentional control and working memory, mediated mainly through the D1 receptor, whereas manipulations of serotonin are shown by contrast to affect reversal learning in monkeys and human volunteers and measures of impulsivity in rats. These findings are discussed in the context of these as well as other neurotransmitter systems (including noradrenaline and acetylcholine) having distinct roles in the neuromodulation of prefrontal cortical function. The capacity of the prefrontal cortex itself to exert top‐down regulation of these ascending neurochemical systems is also discussed. J. Comp. Neurol. 493:140–146, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.20717

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During arousal, there is a significant temporary boost in the capacity to respond to stimuli, indicative of phasic alertness, which is manifested by improved performance on a number of visual and memory tasks.

    “Previous findings demonstrated that during arousal, there is a significant temporary boost in the capacity to respond to stimuli, indicative of phasic alertness, which is manifested by improved performance on a number of visual and memory tasks [59–61].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robbins, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Robbins, Trevor W.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-27
Volume
493
Issue
1
Pages
140-146
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2078134227
Cited by
292
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, dopaminergic pathways, dopamine D1 receptor, attentional control, working memory, impulsivity, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, top-down control, neuromodulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Chemistry, Dopamine, Humans, Models, Neurological, Serotonin, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review