Cited by 48Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFace Recognition and Perception

Localizing the lexicon for reading aloud: replication of a PET study using fMRI

Small, Steven L., Noll, Douglas C., Perfetti, Charles A., Hlustik, Petr, Wellington, Robin, Schneider, Walter·1996·Neuroreport

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to investigate the neural basis of written word recognition in two normal subjects. With a 1.5T scanner and temporal surface coil, T2 gradient echo images were obtained while subjects read words aloud. As a control condition, subjects visualized false font strings and said the word "range' each time such a string appeared. These two conditions were presented in an oscillatory pattern, alternating 30 s of each condition for a total of 4 min. Comparison of the two conditions using cross-correlation demonstrated strong activation in both subjects in the left posterior superior temporal gyrus, near the site predicted for the visual input lexicon by Déjerine and recently demonstrated by positron emission tomography.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-199603220-00027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The left posterior middle/superior temporal gyrus was more activated for reading aloud than viewing false fonts and saying a single word.

    “The first was the left posterior middle/superior temporal gyrus which was more activated for reading aloud than viewing ‘false fonts’ (non-existent letter-like forms that controlled for visual input) and saying a single word (e.g. “crime” or “range”) to control for speech production (Howard et al., 1992; Small et al., 1996).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Small, S. L., Noll, D. C., Perfetti, C. A., Hlustik, P., Wellington, R., & Schneider, W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
1996-03
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
961-965
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053705947
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (KO8-00054)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
visual word recognition, vocabulary, reading aloud, posterior superior temporal gyrus, visual word processing, left hemisphere, neural basis of reading
MeSH terms
Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reading, Speech, Temporal Lobe, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review