Cited by 241Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Beyond words: how do children with ADHD and/or conduct problems process nonverbal information about affect?

CADESKY, ERIC BENJAMIN, MOTA, VICTOR LEWIS, SCHACHAR, RUSSELL J.·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To study nonverbal social cue perception in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; n = 86), conduct problems (CP; n = 24), or both disorders (ADHD + CP; n = 63), as well as normal controls (n = 27).Method Using a standardized test of receptive nonverbal processing abilities, participants were required to interpret emotional cues from pictures of facial expressions and recordings of voices.Results As predicted, children with CP and ADHD were significantly less accurate at interpreting emotions than normal controls. However, children with CP and ADHD differed in the type of errors made: the ADHD group's errors were generally random in nature, whereas the CP group tended to misinterpret emotions as anger. Contrary to our hypothesis, the ADHD + CP group performed better than the ADHD and CP groups, was as accurate as the control group, and displayed a unique pattern of errors.Conclusions These results support the idea that social deficiencies associated with CP arise from a biased perception of emotion, whereas social problems in ADHD originate from a failure to attend to the appropriate cues of affect. The findings also support the theory that comorbid ADHD + CP is a distinct disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200009000-00016

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CADESKY, E. B., MOTA, V. L., & SCHACHAR, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
SCHACHAR, RUSSELL J.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1160-1167
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991348485
Cited by
241
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct problems, facial expression interpretation, voice emotion recognition, social cue processing, social dysfunction, children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Auditory Perception, Child, Cognition, Cues, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Models, Psychological, Nonverbal Communication, Social Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Conduct Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review