Cited by 384Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and Interventions

Issues of taxonomy and comorbidity in the development of conduct disorder

Hinshaw, Stephen P., Lahey, Benjamin B., Hart, Elizabeth L.·1993·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

A developmental approach to the classification of antisocial behavior is necessary for two reasons. First, although the continuity of antisocial behavior is strong for many individuals, the topography of antisocial behavior changes during the course of development. Second, antisocial behavior apparently develops in at least two separate pathways — child-onset versus adolescent-onset — that differ markedly regarding types of antisocial behavior displayed, persistence, and perhaps etiology. The development of antisocial behavior must also be understood within the context of co-occurring disorders and conditions. Comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder appears to be associated with greater aggression and a worse prognosis, and comorbid academic underachievement is also associated with a negative course. Emerging evidence also suggests that comorbid anxiety disorder is associated with level of aggression, but the direction of the correlation appears to differ at different ages. In all, full understanding of conduct disorder requires developmentally sensitive classification as well as consideration of comorbid conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579400004247

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with ADHD+ODD demonstrated significantly different patterns of risk taking and sensitivity to negative punishment than children with either ADHD-only or ODD-only.

    “Children with ADHD+ODD demonstrated significantly different patterns of risk taking and sensitivity to negative punishment than children with either ADHD-only or ODD-only.”
  • The increased risk taking in ADHD+ODD provides evidence that this group is distinct from ADHD-only or ODD-only.

    “The increased risk taking found in children with ADHD+ODD provides additional evidence that this group is distinct from ADHD-only or ODD-only (Hinshaw et al. 1993; Lahey et al. 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinshaw, S. P., Lahey, B. B., & Hart, E. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Hinshaw, Stephen P.
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
1993
Volume
5
Issue
1-2
Pages
31-49
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2064022441
Cited by
384
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
19.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
conduct disorder, antisocial behavior, comorbidities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, academic underachievement, anxiety disorders, aggression, prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review