Cited by 212Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Self-monitoring of blood pressure at home: how many measurements are needed?

Stergiou, George S., Skeva, Irini I., Zourbaki, Andromachi S., Mountokalakis, Theodore D.·1998·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimum number of self-measurements of blood pressure at home (HBP) necessary to provide the maximum clinically important benefit. METHODS: Hypertensive patients were randomly allocated to monitor HBP for 2 weeks (6 work days, duplicate measurements, twice daily) or ambulatory blood pressure for 24 h. The alternative measurement was then performed. Clinic blood pressure was measured at the beginning and the end of the study. Criteria for reliability of HBP were the stabilization of mean HBP, its variability (SD) and the correlation coefficient r for relationship of HBP with ambulatory blood pressure. The reproducibility of HBP was quantified using test-re-test correlations and the SD of differences between average HBP values of different days. RESULTS: We studied 189 patients (79 being administered stable antihypertensive treatment). Average HBP (137.5 +/- 16.2/85.9 +/- 9.9 mmHg) was lower than average clinic blood pressure (P<0.001) and higher than 24 h and night-time ambulatory blood pressures (P<0.001). There was no difference between HBP and daytime ambulatory blood pressure. On day 1 HBP was higher than it was on each of days 2-6, with no difference among days 2-6. When data for the initial day for monitoring of HBP were excluded from analysis, average HBP was reduced. Only a modest improvement in the reliability of HBP on day 2 (reductions in mean HBP and its SD and an increase in r with ambulatory blood pressure) was achieved by averaging more readings taken on succeeding days. At least two monitoring days were needed for the reproducibility of HBP to be superior to that of clinic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that determining average HBP of the second and third work days, is the minimum programme that provides a reliable estimate of HBP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004872-199816060-00002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stergiou, G. S., Skeva, I. I., Zourbaki, A. S., & Mountokalakis, T. D.
Affiliations
Sotiria General Hospital (GR)
Corresponding author
Stergiou, George S.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
1998-06
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
725-731
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988674079
Cited by
212
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
home blood pressure monitoring, hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure, office blood pressure, measurement reliability, reproducibility, antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure variability
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Reproducibility of Results, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review