Cited by 137Sleep and Work-Related FatigueReproductive Health and TechnologiesCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Shift Work and Subfecundity: A European Multicenter Study

Bisanti, Luigi, Olsen, J??rn, Basso, Olga, Thonneau, Patrick, Karmaus, Wilfried·1996·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

Shift work has been associated with various unfavorable pregnancy outcomes (ie, pregnancy loss, spontaneous abortion, low birth weight, etc). The suggested underlying mechanism is the interference of shift work with the circadian regulation of human metabolism and, in particular, with the temporal pattern of endocrine function. To analyze the effect of shift work on fecundity, the Time of Unprotected Intercourses (TUI) has been measured in couples recruited in the European Studies on Infertility and Subfecundity, which were undertaken in seven European countries. A low (odds ratio < 2.0) but consistent excess risk of subfecundity (TUI > or = 9.4 months) has been observed both in a representative sample of the general population of women in reproductive age and in a sample of pregnant women or women who had just given birth. The excess risk was also consistently evident both in the subsample of the first pregnancies and in the subsample of the most recent pregnancies. Only the exposure of women to shift work seemed to affect a couple's fecundity; men working shift work did not modify the fecundity pattern of their own couples. No specific job title among shift workers concentrated the risk of subfecundity. No association of menstrual disorders with shift work was identified. Even though residual confounding could partly account for the results and the fact that a plausible biological explanation of the claimed effect is still lacking, data from this study are in favor of an association between shift work and prolonged waiting time to pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00043764-199604000-00012

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epidemiological studies report increased risks of preterm delivery, low birthweights and miscarriage in pregnant women who are chronic shift-workers.

    “Epidemiological studies report increased risks of preterm delivery, low birthweights and miscarriage in pregnant women who are chronic shift-workers37–40.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bisanti, L., Olsen, J., Basso, O., Thonneau, P., & Karmaus, W.
Affiliations
  • Regione Lombardia (IT)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Bisanti, Luigi
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
1996-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
352-358
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032720200
Cited by
137
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
shift work, subfertility, fecundity, time to pregnancy, unprotected sex, circadian rhythm, endocrine disruption, infertility, menstrual disorders, pregnancy outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Europe, Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Occupational Diseases, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review