Cited by 166Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Understanding how opioids contribute to reward and analgesia

Fields, Howard L.·2007·Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Abstract

Opioids acting at the mu opioid (MOP) receptor produce powerful analgesia. They also produce an intensely rewarding effect that can lead to addiction. The analgesic effect of MOP receptor agonists derives from a direct inhibitory effect on pain transmission at the spinal-cord level and through activation of a descending pain-modulatory pathway. The rewarding effect of MOP agonists is the result of their actions in the mesostriatal dopamine pathway classically associated with both natural and drug rewards. Both the analgesic and rewarding effect of MOP agonists are best understood in the context of decision making under conditions of conflict. Pain is one of many competing motivational states, and endogenous opioids suppress responses to noxious stimuli in the presence of conflicting motivations, such as hunger or a threatening predator. When a food reward is available, MOP agonists microinjected into the mesostriatal circuit promote its consumption, while concomitantly suppressing responses to noxious stimulation. The mesostriatal "reward" circuit, thus, appears to perform a function critical to decision making and can either amplify or suppress responses to noxious stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00115550-200705000-00012

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fields, H. L.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Fields, Howard L.
Venue
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-05
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
242-246
ISSN
1098-7339 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057241840
Cited by
166
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
opioids, mu-opioid receptor, analgesia, reward, descending pain modulation, opioid use disorder, decision-making, motivational conflict, food reward, endogenous opioids, noxious stimuli
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Conflict, Psychological, Decision Making, Dopamine, Escape Reaction, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Medulla Oblongata, Motivation, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Nucleus Accumbens, Pain, Periaqueductal Gray, Reward, Spinal Cord, Behavior, Addictive, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Opioid Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review