Cited by 138Schizophrenia research and treatmentDisability Education and EmploymentMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

INITIAL AND FINAL WORK PERFORMANCE IN SCHIZOPHRENIA: COGNITIVE AND SYMPTOM PREDICTORS

BRYSON, GARY, BELL, MORRIS D.·2003·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Abstract

Studies have shown that cognitive functioning may limit the rate, tenure, and type of work performed by people with schizophrenia. The present study tested the hypothesis that cognitive abilities needed for initial improvement in work performance would differ from those needed in later vocational development. Ninety-six outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who participated in a work rehabilitation program were administered neuropsychological testing at intake. Their work performance was evaluated biweekly for 26 weeks. Cognitive test variables were entered into regressions predicting the slope of individual performance curves from weeks 1 to 13 and 13 to 26. Neuropsychological variables accounted for 28% of the variance in slope during the initial period. The strongest predictor was a Continuous Performance Task variable that measures inattentiveness. Other important variables were measures of idiosyncratic thinking, cognitive flexibility, and verbal memory. Neuropsychological variables accounted for 19% of the variance in the slope during the final period. The strongest predictor was verbal learning, while measures of cognitive impulsivity and psychomotor functioning were also significant contributors. There was no relationship between work performance and symptoms for weeks 1 to 13 or 13 to 26. These findings suggest that while attention is more important for initial success, verbal memory becomes more important for sustained improvement. Remediating or accommodating such deficits in a time-sensitive fashion may be a necessary feature for successful rehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.nmd.0000050937.06332.3c

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BRYSON, G., & BELL, M. D.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
2003-02
Volume
191
Issue
2
Pages
87-92
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997146129
Cited by
138
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, employee performance, vocational rehabilitation, cognitive ability, inattention, verbal memory, cognitive flexibility, verbal learning, cognitive impulsivity, attention, neuropsychological predictors
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Ambulatory Care, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Psychotic Disorders, Regression Analysis, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Sex Factors, Verbal Learning, Work, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review