Cited by 133Smoking Behavior and CessationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Association of smoking and nicotine dependence with trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a general population sample

Hapke, Ulfert, Schumann, Anja, Rumpf, Hans-Juergen, John, Ulrich, Konerding, Uwe, Meyer, Christian·2005·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Abstract

This study is aimed at investigating the association between trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), smoking, and nicotine dependence. Data were collected in a representative population sample of 4075 adults aged 18 to 64 with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Findings show increased odds ratios (ORs) for smoking (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.09-1.51) and nicotine dependence (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.26-1.82) in traumatized persons, independent of PTSD. Persons with PTSD tended to have higher odds for smoking (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.16-3.90) and nicotine dependence (OR: 2.70; 95% CI: 1.57-4.65), but also had lower rates for quitting smoking (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.84) and for remission from nicotine dependence (OR: 0.18; CI: 0.05-0.63). We conclude that persons suffering from PTSD might need comprehensive aid in smoking cessation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.nmd.0000188964.83476.e0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTSD patients showed lower rates of quitting, worse nicotine withdrawal symptoms, and shorter times to first smoking lapse than the non-PTSD population.

    “PTSD patients also showed lower rates of quitting (Hapke et al., 2005; Lasser et al., 2000), suffered from worse nicotine withdrawal symptoms (Dedert et al., 2011), and as a result showed shorter times to first smoking lapse (Beckham, Calhoun, Dennis, Wilson, & Dedert, 2012) than non-PTSD population.”

    From Nicotine addiction and psychiatric disorders (2015) · cites this paper as Hapke et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hapke, U., Schumann, A., Rumpf, H.-J., John, U., Konerding, U., & Meyer, C.
Affiliations
Universität Greifswald (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Hapke, Ulfert
  • John, Ulrich
  • Meyer, Christian
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
2005-12
Volume
193
Issue
12
Pages
843-846
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009156912
Cited by
133
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
smoking, nicotine dependence, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma, smoking cessation, general adult population
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Germany, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Smoking, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Tobacco Use Disorder, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review