Cited by 7Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Behavioral Test (BAT-Back): Preliminary Evidence for a Successful Predictor of Treatment Outcome After Exposure Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain

Holzapfel, Sebastian, Schemer, Lea, Riecke, Jenny, Glombiewski, Julia A.·2021·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives: Although several questionnaires assessing fear of movement exist, it is still a challenge to identify individuals who might benefit more from exposure for chronic pain than from other psychological approaches and vice versa. Psychological approaches to chronic pain cannot advance toward the often called-for “tailored approaches” because of limited knowledge about treatment predictors. Our aim was to evaluate the additional predictive value of avoidance behavior based on behavioral observation. Methods: This study examined pretreatment self-report and behavioral measures as predictors of treatment outcome for n=43 patients experiencing disabling chronic low back pain, who took part in a randomized controlled trial in which they received 10 to 15 sessions of exposure treatment. Only patients with elevated fear avoidance based on self-report measures were included. Data were analyzed using regression analyses and classification and regression trees. Results: Regression analyses showed that higher avoidance behavior at pretreatment as measured by the Behavioral Avoidance Test—Back Pain (BAT-Back) significantly predicted reduction in global disability (with a small to medium effect), but not in specific disability. Self-report measures failed to predict treatment success for both outcome measures. Classification and regression trees divide subgroups who might benefit from exposure treatment through a BAT-Back score of >22 for Pain Disability Index. Discussion: There is some preliminary evidence that pretreatment avoidance behavior might be an indicator for reduction in global disability after exposure treatments in patients experiencing disabling chronic low back pain and elevated fear avoidance. We identified preliminary cutoff scores that need further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000920

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holzapfel, S., Schemer, L., Riecke, J., & Glombiewski, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Holzapfel, Sebastian
  • Riecke, Jenny
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
265-269
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3129089859
Cited by
7
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
behavioral avoidance, fear avoidance, chronic low back pain, exposure therapy, treatment outcome prediction, disability, Pain Disability Index, behavioral observation
MeSH terms
Behavior Rating Scale, Avoidance Learning, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review