Cited by 209Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Endurance exercise beneficially affects ambulatory blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cornelissen, Véronique A., Buys, Roselien, Smart, Neil A.·2013·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

Exercise is widely recommended as one of the key preventive lifestyle changes to reduce the risk of hypertension and to manage high blood pressure (BP), but individual studies investigating the effect of exercise on ambulatory BP have remained inconclusive. Therefore, the primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of aerobic endurance training on daytime and night-time BP in healthy adults. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Clinical trial registry from their inception to May 2012. Randomized controlled trials of at least 4 weeks investigating the effects of aerobic endurance training on ambulatory BP in healthy adults were included. Inverse weighted random effects models were used for analyses, with data reported as weighted means and 95% confidence limits. We included 15 randomized controlled trials, involving 17 study groups and 633 participants (394 exercise participants and 239 control participants). Overall, endurance training induced a significant reduction in daytime SBP [-3.2 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.0 to-1.3] and daytime DBP (-2.7 mmHg, 95% CI, -3.9 to -1.5). No effect was observed on night-time BP. The findings from this meta-analysis suggest that aerobic endurance exercise significantly decreases daytime, but not night-time, ambulatory BP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hjh.0b013e32835ca964

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornelissen, V. A., Buys, R., & Smart, N. A.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of New England (AU)
Corresponding author
Cornelissen, Véronique A.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2013-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
639-648
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079280633
Cited by
209
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
aerobic endurance training, ambulatory blood pressure, hypertension prevention, daytime blood pressure, nocturnal blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, exercise intervention, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Humans, Physical Endurance, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review